Judicial Review Dismissed for Lack of Jurisdiction Due to Available Supervisory Appeal

The reasoning indicates the appeal was declared inadmissible by simplified procedure (though the specific procedural ground for the administrative court's final order is usually derived from cantonal law, in this context, as no specific procedural article for inadmissibility based on wrong venue is given in the dispositive, and given the context often seen in BGG cases, we look for cited procedural norms. If no explicit procedural norm is cited in the dispositive, we must stick strictly to what is cited there. Since the provided text only shows the header/summary and no explicit dispositive section starting with 1., 2., etc., I must rely on the statement that leads to the final decision: 'Abweisung' (Dismissal) based on the reasoning in E. 2 about jurisdiction. Since the summary states 'Abweisung' (Dismissal) based on jurisdiction/wrong instance, and there are no explicit articles cited in the implied dispositive section visible, I will check the mentioned provision § 111 Abs. 1 StG, which is listed under 'Rechtsnormen' but not explicitly in the ruling summary. Given the instruction to only include provisions cited in the final orders, and lacking the explicit dispositive orders, I must conclude based *only* on the available text structure. Since no explicit final orders are visible with citations, I cannot definitively extract any based on the strict rule. However, the summary mentions 'Abweisung' based on jurisdiction, and lists § 111 Abs. 1 StG. Without the explicit numbered orders, I cannot fulfill the requirement perfectly. Assuming the final order *must* contain a disposition based on the cited legal norms and the summary of the result ('Abweisung' based on jurisdiction/wrong venue), I will include the provision listed under 'Rechtsnormen' if it were the basis for the final outcome, but the instruction mandates citation in the dispositive. As no dispositive orders are present, I cannot extract anything other than potential cost provisions, which are also missing. Therefore, following the strict instruction: If the dispositive is not visible, and no costs/legal aid are mentioned in the summary leading to the final decision, the output must be empty.