Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
VB.2016.00670 • VG ZH VB.2016.00670 KI-generiert

Employee Salary Grade Assignment Challenge Rejected Based on General Development Goals

Geschäftsnummer VB.2016.00670
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Zürich (CH-ZH)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A claim challenging a specific salary grade assignment, arguing for a higher placement or maximum salary based on the employer's stated goals for the professional group's salary development, was rejected by the court. The reasoning was that general goals regarding the salary development of a professional group, established by a public law employer, do not create a legal entitlement for an individual employee to a specific salary level or reaching the maximum salary for that classification.

Legislator-Regeste

Amtlich

Lohnklasseneinreihung | [Lohneinstufung] Aus einem vom öffentlichrechtlichen Arbeitgeber angestrebten Ziel der Lohnentwicklung einer Berufsgruppe lässt sich kein Rechtsanspruch auf eine bestimmte Entlohnung bzw. Lohnstufe ableiten, geschweige denn auf Erreichung eines Lohnmaximums (E. 3.4.1). Abweisung.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Lohnkasseneinstufung Abtretung einer Forderung Aufbesserung der Löhne Leistungslohn begründeter Entscheid Lohnrückstand

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 8 Abs. I BV
This provision is listed among the legal norms relevant to the decision, although its specific application in the dispositive is not detailed here, it is included as a cited norm.
§ 16 Abs. I LPV
This provision is listed among the legal norms relevant to the decision, although its specific application in the dispositive is not detailed here, it is included as a cited norm.
§ 16 Abs. II LPV
This provision is listed among the legal norms relevant to the decision, although its specific application in the dispositive is not detailed here, it is included as a cited norm.
§ 16 Abs. V LPV
This provision is listed among the legal norms relevant to the decision, although its specific application in the dispositive is not detailed here, it is included as a cited norm.
§ 29d Abs. I LPV
This provision is listed among the legal norms relevant to the decision, although its specific application in the dispositive is not detailed here, it is included as a cited norm.
§ 29d Abs. III LPV
This provision is listed among the legal norms relevant to the decision, although its specific application in the dispositive is not detailed here, it is included as a cited norm.
KI-generiert
VB.2016.00226
Teacher's Salary Classification Challenge Denied
VB.2021.00437
Appeal on Salary Grade Classification and Costs Award
PB.2008.00005
Teacher Salary Grading Challenge Dismissed on Objective Grounds
PB.2002.00022
Pay Discrimination Reclassification Dispute

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 8 Abs. I BV

This provision is listed among the legal norms relevant to the decision, although its specific application in the dispositive is not detailed here, it is included as a cited norm.

§ 16 Abs. I LPV

This provision is listed among the legal norms relevant to the decision, although its specific application in the dispositive is not detailed here, it is included as a cited norm.

§ 16 Abs. II LPV

This provision is listed among the legal norms relevant to the decision, although its specific application in the dispositive is not detailed here, it is included as a cited norm.

§ 16 Abs. V LPV

This provision is listed among the legal norms relevant to the decision, although its specific application in the dispositive is not detailed here, it is included as a cited norm.

§ 29d Abs. I LPV

This provision is listed among the legal norms relevant to the decision, although its specific application in the dispositive is not detailed here, it is included as a cited norm.

§ 29d Abs. III LPV

This provision is listed among the legal norms relevant to the decision, although its specific application in the dispositive is not detailed here, it is included as a cited norm.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Verwaltungsgericht des Kantons Zürich: VB.2016.00670

--- · --- · --- · --- · --- · [Standard Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/standard.htm) · [Erweiterte Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/advanced.htm) · [Hilfe](/findinfo/help/index.htm)

Druckansicht

--- · --- · --- · Geschäftsnummer: · VB.2016.00670 · Entscheidart und -datum: · Endentscheid vom 04.07.2017 · Spruchkörper: · 4. Abteilung/Einzelrichter · Weiterzug: · Dieser Entscheid ist rechtskräftig. · Rechtsgebiet: · Personalrecht · Betreff: · Lohnklasseneinreihung · [Lohneinstufung] Aus einem vom öffentlichrechtlichen Arbeitgeber angestrebten Ziel der Lohnentwicklung einer Berufsgruppe lässt sich kein Rechtsanspruch auf eine bestimmte Entlohnung bzw. Lohnstufe ableiten, geschweige denn auf Erreichung eines Lohnmaximums (E. 3.4.1).

Abweisung. · --- · Stichworte: · LOHNEINSTUFUNG LOHNGLEICHHEIT RECHTSGLEICHHEIT · Rechtsnormen: · Art. 8 Abs. I BV § 16 Abs. I LPV § 16 Abs. II LPV § 16 Abs. V LPV § 29d Abs. I LPV § 29d Abs. III LPV · Publikationen: · - keine - · Gewichtung: (1 von hoher / 5 von geringer Bedeutung) · Gewichtung: 3