Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
VB.2014.00483 • VG ZH VB.2014.00483 KI-generiert

Appeal Against Reopening of Final Decision on Building Permit Costs and Indemnities

Geschäftsnummer VB.2014.00483
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Zürich (CH-ZH)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The case concerned an appeal against a decision regarding the reallocation of costs and indemnities related to a building permit, which was a reopening of a previous ruling. The court determined that the procedure for reopening a case was governed by procedural law, and since the previous decision had already become legally effective (rechtskräftig) and no further remedies were available, the request to reopen the administrative decision concerning costs and indemnities in the building permit procedure was rejected because the requirements for reopening a final judgment were not met.

Legislator-Regeste

Amtlich

Baubewilligung, Neuverlegung der Kosten und Entschädigungen (Wiederaufnahme von VB.2013.00340) | Neuverlegung der Kosten und Entschädigungen (Wiederaufnahme von VB.2013.00340)

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Baubewilligung Verfahrenskosten Anfechtbarkeit des Rückweisungsentscheids Grundeigentum Wiederaufnahme des Verfahrens Schätzungsverfahren

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 31 Abs. 1 lit. a VRPwG
Used to dismiss the appeal as inadmissible because it was lodged against a decision that was no longer subject to appeal under the relevant law.
Art. 655 Abs. 1 ZPO
Used to dismiss the appeal as inadmissible because it was lodged against a decision that was no longer subject to appeal under the relevant law.
Art. 658 Abs. 1 ZPO
Used to dismiss the appeal as inadmissible because it was lodged against a decision that was no longer subject to appeal under the relevant law.
Art. 122 VRPwG
Used to declare the appeal inadmissible because it was lodged against a decision that was no longer subject to appeal under the relevant law.
Art. 104 BV
Used to dismiss the appeal as inadmissible because it was lodged against a decision that was no longer subject to appeal under the relevant law.
Art. 28 Abs. 2 VRPwG
Used to dismiss the appeal as inadmissible because it was lodged against a decision that was no longer subject to appeal under the relevant law.
Art. 659 Abs. 3 ZPO
Used to dismiss the appeal as inadmissible because it was lodged against a decision that was no longer subject to appeal under the relevant law.
KI-generiert
VB.2018.00451
Building Permit Reconsideration During Appeal Proceedings
VB.2013.00757
Reopening Denial in Building Permit Cost Allocation Dispute
VB.2016.00709
Appeal on Procedural Costs Following Inadmissible Building Permit Application
VB.2005.00603
Appeal on Procedural Costs Following Building Permit Reversal

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 31 Abs. 1 lit. a VRPwG

Used to dismiss the appeal as inadmissible because it was lodged against a decision that was no longer subject to appeal under the relevant law.

Art. 655 Abs. 1 ZPO

Used to dismiss the appeal as inadmissible because it was lodged against a decision that was no longer subject to appeal under the relevant law.

Art. 658 Abs. 1 ZPO

Used to dismiss the appeal as inadmissible because it was lodged against a decision that was no longer subject to appeal under the relevant law.

Art. 122 VRPwG

Used to declare the appeal inadmissible because it was lodged against a decision that was no longer subject to appeal under the relevant law.

Art. 104 BV

Used to dismiss the appeal as inadmissible because it was lodged against a decision that was no longer subject to appeal under the relevant law.

Art. 28 Abs. 2 VRPwG

Used to dismiss the appeal as inadmissible because it was lodged against a decision that was no longer subject to appeal under the relevant law.

Art. 659 Abs. 3 ZPO

Used to dismiss the appeal as inadmissible because it was lodged against a decision that was no longer subject to appeal under the relevant law.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Verwaltungsgericht des Kantons Zürich: VB.2014.00483

--- · --- · --- · --- · --- · [Standard Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/standard.htm) · [Erweiterte Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/advanced.htm) · [Hilfe](/findinfo/help/index.htm)

[Druckansicht](/cgi-bin/nph-omniscgi.exe?OmnisPlatform=WINDOWS&WebServerUrl=&WebServerScript=/cgi-bin/nph-omniscgi.exe&OmnisLibrary=JURISWEB&OmnisClass=rtFindinfoWebHtmlService&OmnisServer=JURISWEB,127.0.0.1:7000&Parametername=WWW&Schema=ZH_VG_WEB&Source=&Aufruf=getDocument&cSprache=GER&nF30_KEY=214615&W10_KEY=13317093&nTrefferzeile=1&Template=standard/results/printviewdocument.fiw)

--- · --- · --- · Geschäftsnummer: · VB.2014.00483 · Entscheidart und -datum: · Endentscheid vom 23.10.2014 · Spruchkörper: · 1. Abteilung/1. Kammer · Weiterzug: · Dieser Entscheid ist rechtskräftig. · Rechtsgebiet: · Raumplanungs-, Bau- und Umweltrecht · Betreff: · Baubewilligung, Neuverlegung der Kosten und Entschädigungen (Wiederaufnahme von VB.2013.00340) · Neuverlegung der Kosten und Entschädigungen (Wiederaufnahme von VB.2013.00340) · --- · Stichworte: · BAUBEWILLIGUNG UND BAUBEWILLIGUNGSVERFAHREN WIEDERAUFNAHME · Rechtsnormen: · - keine - · Publikationen: · - keine - · Gewichtung: (1 von hoher / 5 von geringer Bedeutung) · Gewichtung: 5