Motorist Driving Prohibition Upheld Despite Disproportionate Penalty Claim

A motorist, challenging an administrative decision imposing a driving prohibition for one year following multiple speeding violations over a short period, argued that the severity of the penalty was disproportionate to the risk posed, asserting that the violations occurred on different routes and occasions, thus not indicating habitual disregard for traffic laws. The court upheld the administrative decision, reasoning that the accumulation of multiple, serious infringements, even if chronologically separated and on different roads, demonstrated a sufficiently established pattern of contempt for traffic regulations, justifying the one-year prohibition as a necessary measure to ensure public safety and deter future dangerous driving behavior.