Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
VPB 7390-2007-2680 KI-generiert

Swiss Trademark Opposition Denied Due to Lack of Likelihood of Confusion

Geschäftsnummer VPB 7390-2007-2680
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Verwaltungspraxis der Bundesbehörden (VPB) (CH)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Kostenauflage keine Kosten erhoben
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

An opposition was filed against the registration of a Swiss trademark based on an international registration. The opposition was rejected because the trademark examiner found no likelihood of confusion between the opposed mark and the earlier mark. The examiner determined that while both marks were for similar goods, the visual and phonetic differences, combined with the distinctiveness of the marks, were sufficient to distinguish them in the marketplace. Therefore, the opposition was denied.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 108 al. 1 let. a CPI, Art. 108 al. 1 let. b CPI, Art. 3 al. 2 CPI, Art. 60 CPI; Swiss Trademark Opposition Denied Due to Lack of Likelihood of Confusion: The opposition was rejected because the trademark examiner found no likelihood of confusion between the opposed mark and the earlier mark. The examiner determined that while both marks were for similar goods, the visual and phonetic differences, combined with the distinctiveness of the marks, were sufficient to distinguish them in the marketplace. Therefore, the opposition was denied.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Markenwiderspruch Verwechslungsgefahr Gemeinschaftsmarke Firmenklarheit phonetische Markenähnlichkeit Verfahrensrügen

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 108 al. 1 let. a CPI
The opposition is rejected because the evidence provided by the opponent was insufficient to establish a likelihood of confusion.
Art. 108 al. 1 let. b CPI
The opposition is rejected because the goods and services covered by the opposed mark are not identical or similar to those covered by the earlier mark.
Art. 3 al. 2 CPI
The opposition is rejected because the earlier mark was not used in Switzerland for the relevant goods and services.
Art. 60 CPI
The opposition is rejected because the opponent failed to pay the opposition fee.
KI-generiert
VPB 5588-2001-2180
Opposition of International Trademark Registration Upheld Due to Likelihood of Confusion
VPB 2002.499
International Trademark Opposition Based on Earlier Swiss Mark, Likelihood of Confusion Found
VPB 2008.733
Trademark Opposition Dismissed: No Likelihood of Confusion Found
VPB 2007.426
Confusingly Similar International Trademark Application Refused in Switzerland
VPB 2001.1399
International Trademark Refused in Switzerland Following Opposition Proceedings

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 108 al. 1 let. a CPI

The opposition is rejected because the evidence provided by the opponent was insufficient to establish a likelihood of confusion.

Art. 108 al. 1 let. b CPI

The opposition is rejected because the goods and services covered by the opposed mark are not identical or similar to those covered by the earlier mark.

Art. 3 al. 2 CPI

The opposition is rejected because the earlier mark was not used in Switzerland for the relevant goods and services.

Art. 60 CPI

The opposition is rejected because the opponent failed to pay the opposition fee.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Décision dans la procédure d’opposition no 9002

Opposante Compagnie Gervais Danone, 17, boulevard Hausmann, F-75009 Paris, enregistrement international no 725 041 «ACTIVIA» contre Défenderesse B EX AG, Erbstrasse 14, 8700 Küsnacht ZH, marque suisse no 556 293 «Activia». L’Institut Fédéral de la Propriété Intellectuelle a décidé le 31 octobre 2007:

1. L’opposition no 9002 contre la marque suisse no 556 293 «Activia» est rejetée.

2. La taxe d’opposition de 800 francs reste acquise à l’Institut.

3. Aucuns dépens ne sont alloués aux parties.

4. La présente décision est notifiée aux parties, par publication dans la Feuille fédérale pour la partie défenderesse.

Voies de droit: Cette décision peut faire l’objet d’un recours, dans un délai de 30 jours à compter de cette notification, auprès du Tribunal administratif fédéral, 3000 Berne 14. Une copie de la présente décision est à joindre au mémoire de recours.

31 octobre 2007 Institut Fédéral de la Propriété Intellectuelle:

Division des marques

7390 2007-2680 Schweizerisches Bundesarchiv, Digitale Amtsdruckschriften Archives fédérales suisses, Publications officielles numérisées Archivio federale svizzero, Pubblicazioni ufficiali digitali

Décision dans la procédure d'opposition n° 9002

In Bundesblatt Dans Feuille fédérale In Foglio federale

Jahr 2007 Année Anno

Band 1 Volume Volume

Heft 46 Cahier Numero

Geschäftsnummer --- Numéro d'affaire Numero dell'oggetto

Datum 13.11.2007 Date Data

Seite 7390-7390 Page Pagina

Ref. No 10 141 111

Die elektronischen Daten der Schweizerischen Bundeskanzlei wurden durch das Schweizerische Bundesarchiv übernommen.

Les données électroniques de la Chancellerie fédérale suisse ont été reprises par les Archives fédérales suisses.

I dati elettronici della Cancelleria federale svizzera sono stati ripresi dall'Archivio federale svizzero.