Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
VPB 2003.2179 KI-generiert

EASYMARKET Trademark Opposition Dismissed

Geschäftsnummer VPB 2003.2179
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Verwaltungspraxis der Bundesbehörden (VPB) (CH)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang struck_off
Kostenauflage keine Kosten erhoben
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

This case concerns an opposition filed against a trademark application. The opponent, a company holding a prior trademark, objected to the registration of the mark EASYMARKET. The court excluded the defendant from the proceedings and closed the opposition by classification, meaning the opposition was effectively withdrawn or dismissed without a full examination of the merits. The opposing party's opposition fee was retained by the institute, and no costs were awarded.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 33 al. 2 let. c LPM, Art. 34 al. 2 LPM, Art. 3 al. 3 LPubl, Art. 61 al. 2 LPM, Art. 62 al. 1 LPM; EASYMARKET Trademark Opposition Dismissed: The opponent, a company holding a prior trademark, objected to the registration of the mark EASYMARKET. The court excluded the defendant from the proceedings and closed the opposition by classification, meaning the opposition was effectively withdrawn or dismissed without a full examination of the merits. The opposing party's opposition fee was retained by the institute, and no costs were awarded.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Markenwiderspruch Widerspruchsverfahren Markenname Fall des Ausschlusses Handelsstreitigkeit Eintragung ins Handelsregister

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 33 al. 2 let. c LPM
This article is likely the basis for excluding the defendant from the opposition proceedings due to a procedural violation or a failure to meet a requirement.
Art. 34 al. 2 LPM
This article likely provides the legal basis for closing the opposition proceedings by classification, as indicated in order 2.
Art. 3 al. 3 LPubl
This provision relates to the notification of decisions and is referenced in order 5 concerning the publication of the decision in the Federal Gazette.
Art. 61 al. 2 LPM
This article governs the costs of opposition proceedings and is cited in order 3 regarding the retention of the opposition fee by the Institute.
Art. 62 al. 1 LPM
This article concerns the allocation of costs (dépens) in opposition proceedings and is referenced in order 4, stating that no costs are awarded.
KI-generiert
VPB 5618-2002-2011
Trademark Opposition Rejected
VPB 05-2834-6199
Trademark Opposition Dismissed as Moot After Defendant's Exclusion
VPB 2005.2834
Trademark Opposition Dismissed as Moot After Defendant's Exclusion
VPB 310-2008-0057
Opposition by Classification of Goods/Services
VPB 4830-2003-1580
EASYBOX v. easy.com

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 33 al. 2 let. c LPM

This article is likely the basis for excluding the defendant from the opposition proceedings due to a procedural violation or a failure to meet a requirement.

Art. 34 al. 2 LPM

This article likely provides the legal basis for closing the opposition proceedings by classification, as indicated in order 2.

Art. 3 al. 3 LPubl

This provision relates to the notification of decisions and is referenced in order 5 concerning the publication of the decision in the Federal Gazette.

Art. 61 al. 2 LPM

This article governs the costs of opposition proceedings and is cited in order 3 regarding the retention of the opposition fee by the Institute.

Art. 62 al. 1 LPM

This article concerns the allocation of costs (dépens) in opposition proceedings and is referenced in order 4, stating that no costs are awarded.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Décision dans la procédure d’opposition n° 5640

Opposante easyGroup IP Licensing Limited, The Rotunda, 42–43, Gloucester Crescent, Camden, GB-London NW1 7DL, marque suisse n° 492865 EASYJET, représentée par Kirker & Cie, Conseils en Marques SA, 122, rue de Genève, Case postale 153, 1226 Thônex contre Défenderesse Commercy AG, Buttelstedter Strasse 27c, DE-99427 Weimar, marque suisse n° 493230 EASYMARKET. Le 9 octobre 2003, l’Institut Fédéral de la Propriété Intellectuelle a décidé ce qui suit:

1. La défenderesse est exclue de la procédure d’opposition n° 5640/2002.

2. L’opposition n° 5640/2002 à l’encontre de la marque suisse n° 493230 EASYMARKET est close par classement.

3. La taxe d’opposition de 800 francs reste acquise à l’Institut.

4. Il n’est pas alloué de dépens.

5. La présente décision est notifiée aux parties; par publication dans la Feuille fédérale pour la partie défenderesse.

Voies de droit: La présente décision peut être attaquée par voie de recours dans les 30 jours à dater de sa notification devant la Commission de recours en matière de propriété intellectuelle, Einsteinstrasse 2, 3003 Berne. Les mémoires de recours doivent être présentés en trois exemplaires.

9 octobre 2003 Institut Fédéral de la Propriété Intellectuelle:

Division des marques

2003-2179 6329 Schweizerisches Bundesarchiv, Digitale Amtsdruckschriften Archives fédérales suisses, Publications officielles numérisées Archivio federale svizzero, Pubblicazioni ufficiali digitali

Décision dans la procédure d'opposition n° 5640

In Bundesblatt Dans Feuille fédérale In Foglio federale

Jahr 2003 Année Anno

Band 1 Volume Volume

Heft 41 Cahier Numero

Geschäftsnummer --- Numéro d'affaire Numero dell'oggetto

Datum 21.10.2003 Date Data

Seite 6329-6329 Page Pagina

Ref. No 10 127 766

Die elektronischen Daten der Schweizerischen Bundeskanzlei wurden durch das Schweizerische Bundesarchiv übernommen.

Les données électroniques de la Chancellerie fédérale suisse ont été reprises par les Archives fédérales suisses.

I dati elettronici della Cancelleria federale svizzera sono stati ripresi dall'Archivio federale svizzero.