Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
INC.2002.5407 • GIAR TI INC.2002.5407 Generato dall'IA

Detainee v. Prosecutor General (Investigation Document Access and Deadlines)

Numero d'incarto INC.2002.5407
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Cantone Ticino (CH-TI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio struck_off
Spese processuali senza spese
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A detained person filed a complaint against decisions by the Prosecutor General regarding the deposit of investigation documents and extensions to the filing deadline. The court struck the complaint from the record because it became moot after the Prosecutor General subsequently granted a further extension, which the complainant's counsel tacitly accepted, leading the court to rule that the initial challenge was substantially addressed, and thus ordered no fees but awarded the complainant partial costs.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

280 ss. CPP, Art. 118 CPP, Art. 9 cpv. 4 CPP, Art. 161 ss. CPP, Art. 146 CP, Art. 138 CP; Detainee v. Prosecutor General (Investigation Document Access and Deadlines): The court struck the complaint from the record because it became moot after the Prosecutor General subsequently granted a further extension, which the complainant's counsel tacitly accepted, leading the court to rule that the initial challenge was substantially addressed, and thus ordered no fees but awarded the complainant partial costs.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
accesso ai documenti spese per le indagini ritardo del ministero pubblico insinuazione del credito diritti del detenuto accertamenti complementari Sentenza o decisione senza scheda

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
280 ss. CPP
This article, cited in the preamble but not explicitly in the dispositive, governs general appeal procedures, but the decision relies on the claim becoming moot.
Art. 118 CPP
This article, cited in the preamble but not explicitly in the dispositive, relates to general procedural rules, but the decision relies on the claim becoming moot.
Art. 9 cpv. 4 CPP
This article, cited in the preamble but not explicitly in the dispositive, relates to procedural aspects, but the decision relies on the claim becoming moot.
Art. 161 ss. CPP
These articles, cited in the preamble but not explicitly in the dispositive, relate to the relevant investigative stage, but the decision relies on the claim becoming moot.
Art. 146 CP
This article, cited in the preamble but not explicitly in the dispositive, is a substantive penal code article not used as the basis for the final order.
Art. 138 CP
This article, cited in the preamble but not explicitly in the dispositive, is a substantive penal code article not used as the basis for the final order.
Art. 284 CPP
This article, cited in the preamble but not explicitly in the dispositive, relates to procedural aspects, but the decision relies on the claim becoming moot.
FRS 300.- a titolo di ripetibili
The court orders the State to pay the claimant CHF 300 for costs (repetition fees) in order 2.
Generato dall'IA
INC.2007.51604
Detainee's Complaint on Detention Conditions and Investigation Length Mooted by Indictment
INC.2008.3003
Defendant v. Public Prosecutor (Access to Investigation Files)
INC.2002.5411
Accused v. Prosecutor General (Supplementary Investigative Acts)

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
280 ss. CPP

This article, cited in the preamble but not explicitly in the dispositive, governs general appeal procedures, but the decision relies on the claim becoming moot.

Art. 118 CPP

This article, cited in the preamble but not explicitly in the dispositive, relates to general procedural rules, but the decision relies on the claim becoming moot.

Art. 9 cpv. 4 CPP

This article, cited in the preamble but not explicitly in the dispositive, relates to procedural aspects, but the decision relies on the claim becoming moot.

Art. 161 ss. CPP

These articles, cited in the preamble but not explicitly in the dispositive, relate to the relevant investigative stage, but the decision relies on the claim becoming moot.

Art. 146 CP

This article, cited in the preamble but not explicitly in the dispositive, is a substantive penal code article not used as the basis for the final order.

Art. 138 CP

This article, cited in the preamble but not explicitly in the dispositive, is a substantive penal code article not used as the basis for the final order.

Art. 284 CPP

This article, cited in the preamble but not explicitly in the dispositive, relates to procedural aspects, but the decision relies on the claim becoming moot.

FRS 300.- a titolo di ripetibili

The court orders the State to pay the claimant CHF 300 for costs (repetition fees) in order 2.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Incarto n. INC.2002.5407 · Lugano 7 maggio 2003 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Giudice dell'istruzione e dell'arresto __________ sedente per statuire sul reclamo presentato il 24/29 aprile 2003 da

__________, attualmente detenuto c/o Carcere di __________ patrocinato dall'avv. __________ contro

le decisioni 11/14 aprile 2003 di deposito atti e complementi d'inchiesta e 22/23 aprile 2003 di proroga del termine del deposito atti, entrambe del Procuratore generale avv. __________ (inc. __________);

visto lo scritto 30 aprile 2003 del Procuratore generale mediante il quale si comunica la concessione di una ulteriore proroga del deposito atti;

preso atto dell'accordo verbale da parte del legale del ricorrente a che il reclamo sia, ora, considerato privo d'oggetto riservato giudizio sulle ripetibili;

ritenuto che lo scritto 30 aprile 2003 del Procuratore generale contiene adesione, perlomeno di fatto, a parte delle richieste del reclamante;

viste le norme applicabili ed in particolare gli artt. 138 e 146 CP, 161 ss, 118, 280 ss, 284, 9 cpv. 4 CPP, decide:

1. Il reclamo è stralciato dai ruoli in quanto divenuto privo d'oggetto.

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese, ma al reclamante lo Stato verserà FRS 300.- a titolo di ripetibili.

3. Intimazione:

- avv. __________, per sé e per il reclamante (con copia delle osservazioni del magistrato inquirente);

- Procuratore generale avv. __________.

giudice __________