91.2014.39 · Posted Workers Law Violation and False Attestations (Il Presidente della Pretura Penale)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involves an individual acting as the sole administrator of a company accused of multiple counts of violating the federal law on posted workers by submitting false notification attestations indicating independent lucrative activity on a construction site, when regulatory documentation revealed the workers should have been classified as employees of an Italian company (a failure to properly post workers). The court found the first defendant guilty of repeated contravention of the posted workers law, sentencing him to a fine of 2,500 Swiss Francs plus legal costs, while the second defendant was acquitted of the charges related to specific notification attestations, resulting in state-borne costs for her proceedings.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 106 cpv. 2 CP, Legge federale sui lavoratori distaccati, art. 6 LDist, art. 12 LDist, art. 80 segg, art. 84 segg; Posted Workers Law Violation and False Attestations: The court found the first defendant guilty of repeated contravention of the posted workers law, sentencing him to a fine of 2,500 Swiss Francs plus legal costs, while the second defendant was acquitted of the charges related to specific notification attestations, resulting in state-borne costs for her proceedings.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA

contravvenzione per violazione edilizia violazione del segreto commerciale violazione di obbligazioni contrattuali di lavoro esecuzione – Documenti da produrre imprese di costruzione procedure connesse

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA

Art. 106 cpv. 2 CP

This article is cited in order 2.1.1 to establish the substitute custodial penalty in case of non-payment of the fine.

Legge federale sui lavoratori distaccati

This provision is the substantive law violated, as stated in orders 1 and 3 which confirm the culpability/acquittal concerning contraventions of this law.

art. 6 LDist

This article was cited in the preparatory phase ('richiamati gli art. 6 e 12 LDist') but not explicitly used in the final dispositive orders (1-6).

art. 12 LDist

This article was cited in the preparatory phase ('richiamati gli art. 6 e 12 LDist') but not explicitly used in the final dispositive orders (1-6).

art. 80 segg

This procedural reference was cited in the preparatory phase but not explicitly used in the final dispositive orders (1-6).

art. 84 segg

This procedural reference was cited in the preparatory phase but not explicitly used in the final dispositive orders (1-6).

art. 348 segg. CPP

This procedural reference was cited in the preparatory phase but not explicitly used in the final dispositive orders (1-6).

art. 22 LTG

This reference was cited in the preparatory phase but not explicitly used in the final dispositive orders (1-6).

Generato dall'IA

91.2013.249

Swiss Posted Workers Act False Notification of Employment Status

17.2014.33

False Declaration Regarding Posted Worker Status: Acquittal Due to Misapplication of Sanctioning Provisions

72.2013.165

Fraud and Misappropriation by Company Vice-Director

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Legge federale sui lavoratori distaccati

This provision is the substantive law violated, as stated in orders 1 and 3 which confirm the culpability/acquittal concerning contraventions of this law.

art. 106 cpv. 2 CP

This article is cited in order 2.1.1 to establish the substitute custodial penalty in case of non-payment of the fine.

art. 6 LDist

This article was cited in the preparatory phase ('richiamati gli art. 6 e 12 LDist') but not explicitly used in the final dispositive orders (1-6).

art. 12 LDist

This article was cited in the preparatory phase ('richiamati gli art. 6 e 12 LDist') but not explicitly used in the final dispositive orders (1-6).

art. 80 segg.

This procedural reference was cited in the preparatory phase but not explicitly used in the final dispositive orders (1-6).

art. 84 segg.

This procedural reference was cited in the preparatory phase but not explicitly used in the final dispositive orders (1-6).

art. 348 segg. CPP

This procedural reference was cited in the preparatory phase but not explicitly used in the final dispositive orders (1-6).

art. 22 LTG

This reference was cited in the preparatory phase but not explicitly used in the final dispositive orders (1-6).

Testo completo

Incarto n. 91.2014.39/40/41/42/43/ 44/45/46/47/48 · Bellinzona 14 maggio 2014 · Sentenza In nome della Repubblica e Cantone Ticino

Il Presidente della Pretura penale Marco Kraushaar

sedente con Giovanni Pozzi in qualità di segretario per giudicare

IM 1 (I) IM 2 (I) difesi da: DI 2

visti i decreti d’accusa n. BIL-2014.64, BIL-2014.56, BIL-2014.58, BIL-2014.62, BIL-2014.66, BIL-2014.65, BIL-2014.57, BIL-2014.59, BIL-2014.63 e BIL-2014.67 del 27 gennaio 2014;

preso atto che AINQ 1, ritiene

IM 1

autore colpevole di contravvenzione alla Legge federale sui lavoratori distaccati

per aver fornito, nella sua qualità di socio titolare della __________ Srl, informazioni false e meglio per avere dichiarato a __________ nell’attestato di notifica n.1'869'401 del 26 luglio 2013 che __________ avrebbe esercitato sul cantiere di __________ un’attività lucrativa indipendente in contrasto con la documentazione trasmessa dall’Associazione interprofessionale di controllo (AIC), dalla quale risulta che __________ deve essere parificato a un lavoratore dipendente della ditta italiana __________ Srl di __________ (mancato distacco di lavoratore);