Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
91.2013.108 • PP TI 91.2013.108 Generato dall'IA

Environmental Compliance Case Regarding Inoperable Combustion Plant

Numero d'incarto 91.2013.108
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Cantone Ticino (CH-TI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Spese processuali senza spese
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The defendant was accused of violating environmental protection laws by failing to comply with a municipal order from 2005 to remediate a combustion plant owned by them. However, subsequent verification in November 2013 showed that the defendant had taken the combustion plant out of service several years prior to that date. Based on the fact that the non-compliance was remedied by the cessation of the plant's use, the court acquitted the defendant of the environmental infraction and ordered no payment of fees or costs.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

art. 61 cpv. 1 LPAmb, art. 22 LTG, art. 348 e segg. CPP, art. 422 e segg. CPP, art. 80 e segg. CPP, art. 84 e segg. CPP; Environmental Compliance Case Regarding Inoperable Combustion Plant: However, subsequent verification in November 2013 showed that the defendant had taken the combustion plant out of service several years prior to that date. Based on the fact that the non-compliance was remedied by the cessation of the plant's use, the court acquitted the defendant of the environmental infraction and ordered no payment of fees or costs.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
costi ambientali conformità alle norme ambientali delitto contro l'ambiente sottrazione di energia violazione delle norme sicurezza inquinamento termico

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
art. 61 cpv. 1 LPAmb
Although this provision was cited in the background, the actual acquittal (order 1) is based on the facts established during the hearing concerning the alleged violation of the Federal Law on Environmental Protection (LPAmb).
art. 22 LTG
This provision was cited alongside others that informed the context of the decision, which resulted in acquittal.
art. 348 e segg. CPP
This procedural code section was cited in the background information preceding the operative orders.
art. 422 e segg. CPP
This procedural code section was cited in the background information preceding the operative orders.
art. 80 e segg. CPP
This procedural code section was cited in the background information preceding the operative orders.
art. 84 e segg. CPP
This procedural code section was cited in the background information preceding the operative orders.
art. 11 LPAmb
This provision was cited in the background information preceding the operative orders.
art. 16 LPAmb
This provision was cited in the background information preceding the operative orders.
Generato dall'IA
91.2013.113
Violation of Environmental Protection Law: Failure to Renovate Combustion Plant
91.2013.109
Defendant v. Environmental Protection Agency (Combustion System Repair)
91.2013.78
Environmental Law Violation and Sentencing for Non-Compliance with Remediation Order

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
art. 61 cpv. 1 LPAmb

Although this provision was cited in the background, the actual acquittal (order 1) is based on the facts established during the hearing concerning the alleged violation of the Federal Law on Environmental Protection (LPAmb).

art. 22 LTG

This provision was cited alongside others that informed the context of the decision, which resulted in acquittal.

art. 348 e segg. CPP

This procedural code section was cited in the background information preceding the operative orders.

art. 422 e segg. CPP

This procedural code section was cited in the background information preceding the operative orders.

art. 80 e segg. CPP

This procedural code section was cited in the background information preceding the operative orders.

art. 84 e segg. CPP

This procedural code section was cited in the background information preceding the operative orders.

art. 11 LPAmb

This provision was cited in the background information preceding the operative orders.

art. 16 LPAmb

This provision was cited in the background information preceding the operative orders.

art. 18 LPAmb

This provision was cited in the background information preceding the operative orders.

art. 2 legge

Although not explicitly cited in the text as a standalone article number, the provision referring to the appeal right is contained in order 3, which governs the procedure for challenging the judgment.

art. 3 legge

Although not explicitly cited in the text as a standalone article number, the provision referring to the right to request the reasons for the judgment is contained in order 3, which governs the procedure for challenging the judgment.

art. 2 legge

This article is cited in order 3 concerning the right to appeal.

art. 3 legge

This article is cited in order 3 concerning the right to request the motivation for the sentence.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Incarto n. 91.2013.108 32/607 · Bellinzona 11 dicembre 2013 · Sentenza In nome della Repubblica e Cantone Ticino Il Presidente della Pretura penale Marco Kraushaar

sedente con Petra Vanoni in qualità di segretaria per giudicare

IM 1

visto il decreto d’accusa n. 32/607 del

22 febbraio 2013;

preso atto che la AINQ 1 ritiene l’imputato autore colpevole di

contravvenzione alla LF sulla protezione dell'ambiente,

per avere omesso di adempiere all’ordine di risanare l’impianto a combustione n. __________ sito al mapp. __________ RFD di __________, di sua proprietà, entro il __________ emesso dal Municipio di __________ con risoluzione 31 agosto 2005;

e propone la condanna alla multa di fr. 4'040.- oltre alla tassa di giustizia di fr. 150.-;

preso atto che dall’accertamento eseguito dal controllore in data 15 novembre 2013 risulta che l’impianto dell’imputato è stato messo fuori servizio da alcuni anni;

richiamati gli art. 11, 16, 18 e 61 cpv. 1 LPAmb; 80 e segg., 84 e segg., 348 e segg., 422 e segg. CPP; 22 LTG;

al termine dell’odierno dibattimento e dopo aver motivato oralmente la decisione;

pronuncia 1. è prosciolto dall’imputazione di contravvenzione alla LF sulla protezione dell'ambiente per i fatti descritti nel decreto d'accusa n. 32/607 del 22 febbraio 2013.

2. Non si prelevano né tasse né spese.

3. Questo giudizio può essere impugnato mediante appello; lo stesso va annunciato alla Pretura penale entro

10 giorni dalla comunicazione della sentenza, per scritto oppure oralmente a verbale. Entro lo stesso termine può essere chiesta la motivazione della sentenza.

4. Intimazione a:

IM 1

terzi implicati · P_GLOSS_TERZI

Il presidente: La segretaria: