81.2012.87 • PP TI 81.2012.87 Generato dall'IA

Acquittal for Failure to Meet Duties After Accident

Numero d'incarto 81.2012.87

Autorità giudiziaria Il Presidente della Pretura Penale

Giurisdizione

Svizzera · Cantone Ticino (CH-TI)

Data della decisione 2013-07-26

Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)

Spese processuali a carico dell'autorità / Stato

Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The defendant, accused under an indictment of failing to meet duties in the event of an accident, contested the charge and requested acquittal. The court, considering the relevant articles of the Road Traffic Act and the Code of Criminal Procedure, ultimately acquitted the defendant of the offense as described in the indictment, ordering that court fees and judicial costs be borne by the state.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 92 cpv. 1 LCS, Art. 51 cpv.3 LCS, art. 92 cpv. 1 LCS in rel. con l’art. 51 cpv.3 LCS, art. 80 e segg. CPP, art. 84 e segg. CPP, art. 348 e segg. CPP; Acquittal for Failure to Meet Duties After Accident: The court, considering the relevant articles of the Road Traffic Act and the Code of Criminal Procedure, ultimately acquitted the defendant of the offense as described in the indictment, ordering that court fees and judicial costs be borne by the state.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA

incidente stradale dovere procedurale accusa procedura direttrice circostanza aggravante esecuzione della pena Inosservanza dei doveri in caso d'infortunio; assoluzione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA

Art. 92 cpv. 1 LCS

richiamati gli art. 92 cpv. 1 LCS in rel.

Art. 51 cpv.3 LCS

con l’art. 51 cpv.3 LCS; 80 e segg., 84 e segg., 348 e segg., 422 e segg.

art. 92 cpv. 1 LCS in rel. con l’art. 51 cpv.3 LCS

These articles were cited in the preamble as the general legal basis for the decision regarding the alleged offense (failure to report an accident), leading to the acquittal.

art. 80 e segg. CPP

These procedural articles were cited in the preamble as relevant to the proceedings, leading to the final decision.

art. 84 e segg. CPP

These procedural articles were cited in the preamble as relevant to the proceedings, leading to the final decision.

art. 348 e segg. CPP

These procedural articles were cited in the preamble as relevant to the proceedings, leading to the final decision.

art. 422 e segg. CPP

These procedural articles were cited in the preamble as relevant to the proceedings, leading to the final decision.

This procedural article was cited in the preamble as relevant to the proceedings, leading to the final decision.

Generato dall'IA

State v. Defendant (Acquittal on Evasion and Post-Accident Duties)

Traffic Accident, Fleeing Scene (Acquittal on Qualified Charge)

Acquittal in Traffic Accident and Failure to Render Aid Case

Failure to Fulfill Duties After Accident/Hit-and-Run Upholding

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA

art. 92 cpv. 1 LCS in rel. con l’art. 51 cpv.3 LCS

These articles were cited in the preamble as the general legal basis for the decision regarding the alleged offense (failure to report an accident), leading to the acquittal.

art. 80 e segg. CPP

These procedural articles were cited in the preamble as relevant to the proceedings, leading to the final decision.

art. 84 e segg. CPP

These procedural articles were cited in the preamble as relevant to the proceedings, leading to the final decision.

art. 348 e segg. CPP

These procedural articles were cited in the preamble as relevant to the proceedings, leading to the final decision.

art. 422 e segg. CPP

These procedural articles were cited in the preamble as relevant to the proceedings, leading to the final decision.

art. 22 LTG

This procedural article was cited in the preamble as relevant to the proceedings, leading to the final decision.

art. 348 e segg. CPP

These procedural articles were cited in the preamble as relevant to the proceedings, leading to the final decision.

art. 422 e segg. CPP

These procedural articles were cited in the preamble as relevant to the proceedings, leading to the final decision.

art. 22 LTG

This procedural article was cited in the preamble as relevant to the proceedings, leading to the final decision.

art. 348 e segg. CPP

These procedural articles were cited in the preamble as relevant to the proceedings, leading to the final decision.

art. 422 e segg. CPP

These procedural articles were cited in the preamble as relevant to the proceedings, leading to the final decision.

art. 22 LTG

This procedural article was cited in the preamble as relevant to the proceedings, leading to the final decision.

art. 348 e segg. CPP

These procedural articles were cited in the preamble as relevant to the proceedings, leading to the final decision.

art. 422 e segg. CPP

These procedural articles were cited in the preamble as relevant to the proceedings, leading to the final decision.

art. 22 LTG

This procedural article was cited in the preamble as relevant to the proceedings, leading to the final decision.

Testo completo

Incarto n. 81.2012.87/ DA 978/2012 · Bellinzona 26 luglio 2013 · Sentenza In nome della Repubblica e Cantone Ticino

Il Giudice della Pretura penale Siro Quadri

sedente con Daniela Regazzi Fornera in qualità di cancelliera

IM 1

visto il decreto d’accusa n. DA 978/2012 del 28 febbraio 2012;

preso atto che il AINQ 1 ritiene l’imputato autore colpevole d’inosservanza dei doveri in caso d'infortunio e propone la condanna a

1. Alla multa di fr. 200.-, ritenuto che in caso di mancato pagamento, sarà sostituita con una pena detentiva di giorni 2.

2. Al pagamento della tassa di giustizia di fr. 50.- e delle spese giudiziarie di fr. 50.-.

3. La condanna non verrà iscritta a casellario giudiziale.

rilevato imputato chiede il proscioglimento ritenuto che non ha commesso il fatto

richiamati gli art. 92 cpv. 1 LCS in rel. con l’art. 51 cpv.3 LCS; 80 e segg., 84 e segg., 348 e segg., 422 e segg. CPP; 22 LTG;

al termine dell’odierno dibattimento e dopo aver motivato oralmente la decisione;

pronuncia 1. IM 1 è autore prosciolto dall’imputazione d’inosservanza dei doveri in caso d'infortunio per i fatti descritti nel decreto d’accusa DA 978/2012 del 28 febbraio 2012.

2. La tassa di giustizia e le spese giudiziarie di complessivi fr. 200.- sono a carico dello Stato.

3. Questo giudizio può essere impugnato mediante appello; lo stesso va annunciato alla Pretura penale entro

10 giorni dalla comunicazione della sentenza, per scritto oppure oralmente a verbale. Entro lo stesso termine può essere chiesta la motivazione della sentenza.

4. Intimazione a:

- per raccomandata

- alla crescita in giudicato

Comando della Polizia Cantonale, Bellinzona,

Ufficio del giudice dei provvedimenti coercitivi, Lugano,

Sezione della circolazione, Ufficio giuridico, Camorino.

terzi implicati · P_GLOSS_TERZI

Il giudice: La cancelliera

Distinta spese a carico dello Stato,

fr. 100.00 tassa di giustizia

fr. 100.00 spese giudiziarie

fr. 200.00 totale