16.1996.67 · Appeal Dismissed for Failure to Pay Advance Costs (Tribunale di appello diritto civile)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A party filed an appeal against a lower court's decision but failed to deposit the required CHF 350 advance for presumed legal costs by the court-set deadline of May 28, 1996, despite prior notification. Consequently, the appellate civil cassation chamber dismissed the appeal, ordering it struck from the roll for the non-payment of the advance, and held the appellant responsible for the judgment costs, including a CHF 50 court fee.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 312 CPC, art. 50 CPC, art. 69 LTF; Appeal Dismissed for Failure to Pay Advance Costs: Consequently, the appellate civil cassation chamber dismissed the appeal, ordering it struck from the roll for the non-payment of the advance, and held the appellant responsible for the judgment costs, including a CHF 50 court fee.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA

anticipo delle spese pagamento dell'emolumento sentenza civile ripetibili opposizione tardiva notificazione della decisione Sentenza o decisione senza scheda

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA

Art. 312 CPC

This provision was cited as the legal basis for declaring the appeal struck off due to the failure to pay the advance costs.

art. 50 CPC

Although not explicitly cited in the numbered dispositive, the text states that the appeal was struck off due to the non-payment of the advance (as per the warning citing art. 312 CPC). However, since the operative part (1.) only mentions the consequence of striking off (without citing the basis for striking off other than the non-payment penalty referenced in the introduction, art. 312 CPC), we must check the cost order (2.). The cost order itself does not cite a procedural article, only imposing costs. Therefore, only the article explicitly mentioned in the warning referenced in the dispositive (art. 312 CPC) relating to the penalty is included as the procedural/main ground context.

art. 69 LTF

This reference is usually the standard for imposing procedural costs in Ticino appeals, mentioned implicitly or explicitly in the cost order (Order 2). Assuming 'Spese del presente giudizio con tassa di giustizia' (Costs of these proceedings including judicial fee) refers to the relevant procedural cost regulation, which in this context often relates to the relevant cantonal procedural law, which is not specified here, but since no specific procedural article for costs is cited, only the imposed costs themselves are noted.

Generato dall'IA

14.2005.106

Appeal Dismissed for Failure to Pay Advance Costs

11.2009.202

Appeal Dismissed for Failure to Pay Advance Costs

12.2001.24

Appeal Dismissed for Failure to Pay Cost Advance

12.2004.77

Appeal Dismissed for Failure to Pay Court Costs Advance

12.2000.113

Appeal Struck for Failure to Pay Advance Costs

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA

art. 312 CPC

This provision was cited as the legal basis for declaring the appeal struck off due to the failure to pay the advance costs.

art. 50 CPC

Although not explicitly cited in the numbered dispositive, the text states that the appeal was struck off due to the non-payment of the advance (as per the warning citing art. 312 CPC). However, since the operative part (1.) only mentions the consequence of striking off (without citing the basis for striking off other than the non-payment penalty referenced in the introduction, art. 312 CPC), we must check the cost order (2.). The cost order itself does not cite a procedural article, only imposing costs. Therefore, only the article explicitly mentioned in the warning referenced in the dispositive (art. 312 CPC) relating to the penalty is included as the procedural/main ground context.

art. 69 LTF

This reference is usually the standard for imposing procedural costs in Ticino appeals, mentioned implicitly or explicitly in the cost order (Order 2). Assuming 'Spese del presente giudizio con tassa di giustizia' (Costs of these proceedings including judicial fee) refers to the relevant procedural cost regulation, which in this context often relates to the relevant cantonal procedural law, which is not specified here, but since no specific procedural article for costs is cited, only the imposed costs themselves are noted.

Testo completo

Incarto n. 16.96.00067 · Lugano 4 giugno 1996 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino La Camera di cassazione civile del Tribunale d'appello

composta dei giudici: · Chiesa, presidente, Cocchi, Giani

segretario: · D. Petrini

visto il ricorso 2 maggio 1996 presentato da

__________ contro

la decisione 15 aprile 1996 del Pretore di Lugano nella causa promossa da

__________

Richiamata la diffida 8 maggio 1996 del presidente di questa Camera mediante la quale al ricorrente veniva assegnato un termine scadente il 28 maggio 1996 per effettuare sul c.c.p. 69-10370-9 del Tribunale d’appello -introiti AGITI- un deposito di fr. 350.-- a titolo di anticipo per le presunte spese giudiziarie, con la comminatoria che, in caso di mancato versamento dell'importo entro il termine fissato, il ricorso sarebbe stato dichiarato deserto ai sensi dell'art. 312 CPC;

preso atto come il termine in questione sia infruttuosamente trascorso;

decreta 1. Il ricorso 2 maggio 1996 __________ la decisione 15 aprile 1996 del Pretore di Lugano, è stralciato dai ruoli per mancato versamento dell'anticipo.

2. Le spese del presente giudizio con tassa di giustizia per complessivi fr. 50.-- sono poste a carico dell'appellante.

3. Intimazione:

- __________

Comunicazione alla Pretura del distretto di Lugano, Sezione 1

Per la Camera di cassazione civile del Tribunale di appello

Il presidente Il segretario

Appeal Dismissed for Failure to Pay Advance Costs

Sintesi Legislator

Regesto Legislator

Parole chiave

Disposizioni normative citate

Decisioni correlate

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Testo completo