15.2000.115 · Appeal Withdrawal and Striking from Roll (Tribunale di appello diritto civile)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A party filed an appeal against the actions of the enforcement and bankruptcy office regarding various enforcement procedures initiated against them, but subsequently withdrew the appeal via letter before any substantive decision on the merits was reached. Because the appeal was withdrawn, the court considered the matter moot and consequently struck the appeal from the roll, ordered no court fees or indemnities to be levied, and informed the appellant of their right to appeal this procedural decision to the Federal Tribunal.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 20a cpv. 1 primo, Art. 19 LEF, art. 20a cpv. 1 primo periodo LEF, art. 61 cpv. 2 lett. a OTLEF, art. 62 cpv. 2 OTLEF; Appeal Withdrawal and Striking from Roll: Because the appeal was withdrawn, the court considered the matter moot and consequently struck the appeal from the roll, ordered no court fees or indemnities to be levied, and informed the appellant of their right to appeal this procedural decision to the Federal Tribunal.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA

diritto di recesso decisione d'esecuzione decisioni incidentali abbandono definitivo del procedimento lettera di garanzia annullamento della dichiarazione di fallimento Sentenza o decisione senza scheda

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA

Art. 20a cpv. 1 primo

richiamati gli art. 20a cpv. 1 primo periodo LEF, 61 cpv.

Art. 19 LEF

This article governs the possibility of appealing the current decision to the Federal Tribunal.

art. 20a cpv. 1 primo periodo LEF

This article is cited implicitly in the context of the appeal being withdrawn and thus removed from the roll (though the dispositive itself doesn't repeat it, the introductory considerations link the withdrawal to the provisions that govern procedure/disposal in such cases).

art. 61 cpv. 2 lett. a OTLEF

This article is cited implicitly in the context of the appeal being withdrawn and thus removed from the roll (though the dispositive itself doesn't repeat it, the introductory considerations link the withdrawal to the provisions that govern procedure/disposal in such cases).

art. 62 cpv. 2 OTLEF

This article is cited implicitly in the context of the appeal being withdrawn and thus removed from the roll (though the dispositive itself doesn't repeat it, the introductory considerations link the withdrawal to the provisions that govern procedure/disposal in such cases).

Generato dall'IA

15.2002.77

Appeal Against Enforcement Proceedings Withdrawn and Struck from Roll

15.2000.148

Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal

15.1999.67

Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal

15.1999.65

Withdrawal of Appeal in Enforcement Proceedings

12.1999.6

Appeal Withdrawn and Struck from Roll

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA

art. 20a cpv. 1 primo periodo LEF

This article is cited implicitly in the context of the appeal being withdrawn and thus removed from the roll (though the dispositive itself doesn't repeat it, the introductory considerations link the withdrawal to the provisions that govern procedure/disposal in such cases).

art. 61 cpv. 2 lett. a OTLEF

This article is cited implicitly in the context of the appeal being withdrawn and thus removed from the roll (though the dispositive itself doesn't repeat it, the introductory considerations link the withdrawal to the provisions that govern procedure/disposal in such cases).

art. 62 cpv. 2 OTLEF

This article is cited implicitly in the context of the appeal being withdrawn and thus removed from the roll (though the dispositive itself doesn't repeat it, the introductory considerations link the withdrawal to the provisions that govern procedure/disposal in such cases).

art. 19 LEF

This article governs the possibility of appealing the current decision to the Federal Tribunal.

Testo completo

Incarto n. 15.2000.00115 · Lugano 3 ottobre 2000/FP/fc/fb · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino La Camera di esecuzione e fallimenti del Tribunale d'appello quale autorità di vigilanza

composta dei giudici: · Cometta, presidente Pellegrini e Zali

segretario: · Baur Martinelli, vicecancelliera

statuendo sul ricorso 21 agosto 2000 di

__________ Contro

l’operato dell’Ufficio di esecuzione e fallimenti di Bellinzona nell’ambito delle diverse procedure esecutive promosse nei confronti della ricorrente

richiamata l’ordinanza presidenziale 23 agosto 2000 con la quale al ricorso non è stato

concesso effetto sospensivo;

preso atto che con lettera 21 settembre 2000 la __________ ha dichiarato di ritirare il ricorso;

considerato come il gravame sia così divenuto privo di oggetto;

richiamati gli art. 20a cpv. 1 primo periodo LEF, 61 cpv. 2 lett. a e 62 cpv. 2 OTLEF

pronuncia:

1. Il ricorso 21 agosto 2000 __________, è stralciato dai ruoli per intervenuto ritiro.

2. Non si prelevano tasse, né si assegnano indennità.

3. Contro questa decisione è dato ricorso entro dieci giorni alla Camera delle esecuzioni e dei fallimenti del Tribunale federale a Losanna, per il tramite della scrivente Camera di esecuzione e fallimenti del Tribunale d’appello, in conformità dell’art. 19 LEF.

4. Intimazione a: - __________

Comunicazione all’UEF di Bellinzona

Per la Camera di esecuzione e fallimenti del Tribunale d’appello quale autorità di vigilanza

Il presidente: La segretaria:

Appeal Withdrawal and Striking from Roll

Sintesi Legislator

Regesto Legislator

Parole chiave

Disposizioni normative citate

Decisioni correlate

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Testo completo