Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
14.2006.14 • TRAC TI 14.2006.14 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Bankruptcy Closure Due to Untimely Challenge of Creditor Ranking

Numero d'incarto 14.2006.14
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Cantone Ticino (CH-TI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Spese processuali a carico del ricorrente / reclamante
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An appellant contested the closure of bankruptcy proceedings, arguing that their claims were improperly excluded from the creditor ranking and never formally disputed. The court dismissed the appeal because a related challenge by the same party against the creditor ranking had already been declared untimely in a concurrent ruling, meaning the ranking was considered final and binding, thus precluding the appellant from overturning the bankruptcy closure on the basis of those unaddressed claims.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 313bis CPC, Art. 25 LALEF, Art. 268 LEF, art. 18 LALEF, art. 19 LALEF, art. 48 OTLEF; Appeal Against Bankruptcy Closure Due to Untimely Challenge of Creditor Ranking: The court dismissed the appeal because a related challenge by the same party against the creditor ranking had already been declared untimely in a concurrent ruling, meaning the ranking was considered final and binding, thus precluding the appellant from overturning the bankruptcy closure on the basis of those unaddressed claims.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
credito nel fallimento procedure connesse opposizione tardiva credito contestato legittimazione a ricorrere chiusura dell'azienda Ricorso contro il decreto di chiusura del fallimento.

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 313bis CPC
This provision is cited in the summary of articles considered for the ruling and justifies the decision not to award compensation.
Art. 25 LALEF
This provision is cited in the summary of articles considered for the ruling and is relevant to the point about not awarding compensation (as confirmed by the reasoning regarding art. 313bis CPC).
Art. 268 LEF
This provision is cited in the summary of articles considered for the ruling and underlies the decision to reject the appeal regarding the closure of the bankruptcy.
art. 18 LALEF
This provision is cited in the summary of articles considered for the ruling, relating to the procedure or grounds for the decision.
art. 19 LALEF
This provision is cited in the summary of articles considered for the ruling, relating to the procedure or grounds for the decision.
art. 48 OTLEF
This provision, cited in the reasoning section, relates to the allocation of costs, which is detailed in the dispositive regarding court fees.
art. 49 OTLEF
This provision, cited in the reasoning section, relates to the allocation of costs, which is detailed in the dispositive regarding court fees.
art. 61 cpv. 1 OTLEF
This provision, cited in the reasoning section, relates to the allocation of costs, which is detailed in the dispositive regarding court fees.
Generato dall'IA
15.2002.174
Appeal Dismissed for Untimely Filing of Bankruptcy Creditor Ranking Challenge
15.2005.79
Creditor's Appeal of Bankruptcy Closure Rejected Due to Untimely Challenge to Suspension
15.1997.61
Appeal Regarding Creditor Ranking in Bankruptcy Proceeding
15.2004.188
Creditor's Appeal of Bankruptcy Ranking Dismissed as Untimely

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
art. 268 LEF

This provision is cited in the summary of articles considered for the ruling and underlies the decision to reject the appeal regarding the closure of the bankruptcy.

art. 18 LALEF

This provision is cited in the summary of articles considered for the ruling, relating to the procedure or grounds for the decision.

art. 19 LALEF

This provision is cited in the summary of articles considered for the ruling, relating to the procedure or grounds for the decision.

art. 25 LALEF

This provision is cited in the summary of articles considered for the ruling and is relevant to the point about not awarding compensation (as confirmed by the reasoning regarding art. 313bis CPC).

art. 313bis CPC

This provision is cited in the summary of articles considered for the ruling and justifies the decision not to award compensation.

art. 48 OTLEF

This provision, cited in the reasoning section, relates to the allocation of costs, which is detailed in the dispositive regarding court fees.

art. 49 OTLEF

This provision, cited in the reasoning section, relates to the allocation of costs, which is detailed in the dispositive regarding court fees.

art. 61 cpv. 1 OTLEF

This provision, cited in the reasoning section, relates to the allocation of costs, which is detailed in the dispositive regarding court fees.

art. 62 cpv. 1 OTLEF

This provision, cited in the reasoning section, relates to the allocation of costs, which is detailed in the dispositive regarding court fees.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Incarto n. 14.2006.14 · Lugano 29 maggio 2006 CJ/sc/rgc · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone Ticino La Camera di esecuzione e fallimenti del Tribunale d'appello

composta dei giudici: · Chiesa, presidente, Pellegrini e Walser

segretario: · Jaques

statuendo sulla causa a procedura sommaria appellabile (inc. EF.2006.1) promossa con istanza 3 gennaio 2006 da

CO 1 __________, __________

nella loro funzione di amministrazione speciale del fallimento di CO 1 ;

visto l’appello 9 febbraio 2006 interposto da

RI 1

contro la chiusura del fallimento decretata il 4 gennaio 2006 dal Pretore della __________;

ritenuto in fatto e considerato in diritto:

che l’appellante si aggrava contro il decreto di chiusura del fallimento, affermando che i suoi crediti non sono stati iscritti nella graduatoria e non sono stati oggetto di una decisione di contestazione;

che con sentenza odierna (inc. 15.2006.24), questa Camera ha dichiarato tardivo il ricorso interposto dall’appellante contro la graduatoria;

che in queste condizioni, poiché la graduatoria è da considerare cresciuta in giudicato, l’appello va respinto;

che le spese seguono la soccombenza (art. 48, 49, 61 cpv. 1 e 62 cpv. 1 OTLEF);

che non si assegnano indennità, l’appello non essendo stato intimato all’amministrazione speciale in virtù dell’art. 313bis CPC (per il rinvio dell’art. 25 LALEF).

Per questi motivi,

richiamati gli art. 268 LEF, 18, 19, 25 LALEF e 313bis CPC

pronuncia:

1. L’appello

9 febbraio 2006 della RI 1, __________, è respinto.

2. La tassa di giustizia di fr. 100.-- è posta a carico dell’appellante. Non si assegnano indennità.

3. Intimazione a:

– RI 1, __________;

– avv. RA 1, __________.

Comunicazione alla Pretura __________.

terzi implicati

Per la Camera di esecuzione e fallimenti del Tribunale d’appello

Il presidente La segretaria