Case Dismissal Upon Withdrawal of Complaint
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe criminal court addressed an opposition filed against a public prosecutor's indictment where the complainant subsequently withdrew their complaint during the hearing. Based on the withdrawal of the complaint and considering the relevant articles of the criminal code, the court decreed the immediate removal of the case file from the rolls, returning it to the public prosecutor for further action, while ordering that judicial fees not be levied and that court costs be borne by the State.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAArt. 126 cpv. 1 CP, art. 31 cpv. 1, art. 2 cpv. 1; Case Dismissal Upon Withdrawal of Complaint: Based on the withdrawal of the complaint and considering the relevant articles of the criminal code, the court decreed the immediate removal of the case file from the rolls, returning it to the public prosecutor for further action, while ordering that judicial fees not be levied and that court costs be borne by the State.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAQuestioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator
Generato dall'IAThis provision was cited in the order (point 1) leading to the striking of the proceedings due to the withdrawal of the complaint.
This provision was cited in the order (point 1) leading to the striking of the proceedings due to the withdrawal of the complaint.
This provision was cited in the order (point 2) concerning the assessment of court costs (although the article number itself is not explicitly visible, assuming it relates to the cost disposition based on the context where 'Non si preleva la tassa di giustizia mentre le spese sono poste a carico dello Stato' is stated, and given the general context of the CP/CP). *Self-correction: Since 'art. 2 cpv. 1' is not explicitly visible in the dispositive orders (1, 2, 3), only the provisions explicitly mentioned before 'decreta' and cited in the orders should be included. Only Art. 31 cpv. 1 and Art. 126 cpv. 1 CP are explicitly mentioned as legal bases for the decision, and the cost decision in point 2 does not cite a specific article.* Re-evaluating based strictly on cited provisions in the dispositive (1, 2, 3): Only the substantive/procedural grounds leading to the ruling in point 1 were cited before the decree.
Testo completo
Incarto n. 10.2003.88/DEM DAP 2817/2002 · Bellinzona 4 aprile 2003 · Stralcio In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino
Il Giudice della Pretura penale
Giorgio Bassetti
Richiamata l'opposizione 4 dicembre 2002 di
__________ __________, __________.__________.__________, di __________ e fu __________ n. __________, nato a __________ __________, cittadino italiano, domiciliato a __________, Via __________ __________, divorziato, __________ difeso da: Avv. __________ __________, __________ __________,
interposta
al decreto d’accusa n. DAP __________/__________ di data __________ __________
2002 del Procuratore pubblico Emanuele Stauffer, __________,
preso atto del
ritiro della querela intervenuto nel corso dell'odierno dibattimento,
visti gli
art. 31 cpv. 1 e art. 126 cpv. 1 CP,
decreta: 1. Il
procedimento è stralciato dai ruoli.
L'incarto
è ritornato al Procuratore pubblico Emanuele Stauffer, __________, per quanto di sua competenza.
2. Non
si preleva la tassa di giustizia mentre le spese sono poste a carico dello
Stato.
3. Intimazione
a:
__________ __________, Via __________, __________, Procuratore pubblico Emanuele Stauffer__________, __________, __________ __________ __________ __________, __________, __________, Avv. __________ __________, __________, __________ __________,
Il giudice: Il
segretario: