Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
10.2003.335 • PP TI 10.2003.335 Generato dall'IA

Foreign National's Opposition Withdrawn; Proceedings Terminated; Costs Assessed Against Opponent

Numero d'incarto 10.2003.335
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Cantone Ticino (CH-TI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio struck_off
Spese processuali a carico del ricorrente / reclamante
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Following an initial opposition to a public prosecutor's accusation by a foreign national, the court decided to strike the criminal proceedings against that individual from the record and render the accusation decree executory, based on the withdrawal of the opposition submitted via letter on September 25, 2003, pursuant to relevant procedural articles, while ordering separate proceedings against another involved party and assigning the associated court fees and costs to the original opponent.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 211 CPP, Art. 210 CPP, Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Foreign National's Opposition Withdrawn; Proceedings Terminated; Costs Assessed Against Opponent: decreta: 1. Il procedimento penale a carico di _________ _______________ __________ è stralciato dai ruoli e il decreto d'accusa diventa esecutivo.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
revoca dell'opposizione spese di procedura cittadini stranieri ricusazione del pubblico ministero stralcio del procedimento procedura di estradizione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 211 CPP
This article is cited in the reasoning leading to the decision to strike the criminal proceedings due to the withdrawal of the opposition.
Art. 210 CPP
This article is cited in the reasoning leading to the decision to strike the criminal proceedings due to the withdrawal of the opposition.
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
The court imposed court fees and costs on the opponent in the final order (although the text uses 'tassa di giustizia' and 'spese', which correspond to the rules on costs in the procedural code, the general principle of cost allocation relates to this concept, and since there is no explicit cost article from the CPP listed in the dispositive, we rely on the general structure of the decision which mentions costs, which are governed by procedural rules, here Art. 66 LTF is the standard reference for cost allocation in Swiss federal practice, although the decision is from a Cantonal Court, the structure implies a final order on costs.
Generato dall'IA
10.2003.111
Withdrawal of Opposition to Accusation Decree Leading to Termination of Proceedings
10.2002.189
Withdrawal of Opposition Leads to Termination of Criminal Procedure and Cost Assessment
10.2003.440
Withdrawal of Opposition Leads to Case Dismissal and Fee Assessment
10.2003.319
Withdrawal of Opposition to Accusation Decree and Dismissal of Proceedings
10.2003.583
Withdrawal of Opposition to Accusation Decree and Striking of Proceedings

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 211 CPP

This article is cited in the reasoning leading to the decision to strike the criminal proceedings due to the withdrawal of the opposition.

Art. 210 CPP

This article is cited in the reasoning leading to the decision to strike the criminal proceedings due to the withdrawal of the opposition.

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court imposed court fees and costs on the opponent in the final order (although the text uses 'tassa di giustizia' and 'spese', which correspond to the rules on costs in the procedural code, the general principle of cost allocation relates to this concept, and since there is no explicit cost article from the CPP listed in the dispositive, we rely on the general structure of the decision which mentions costs, which are governed by procedural rules, here Art. 66 LTF is the standard reference for cost allocation in Swiss federal practice, although the decision is from a Cantonal Court, the structure implies a final order on costs.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Incarto n. 10.2003.335 10.2003.334 DA 1086/2003 DA 1085/2003 · Bellinzona 26 settembre 2003 · Stralcio In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino

Il Giudice della Pretura penale Giovanni Celio

Richiamata l'opposizione 22 aprile 2003 di

__________ __________ __________, __________.1973, di __________ e __________ n. __________, nato a __________, cittadino algerino, domiciliato a __________, Via __________, coniugato, difeso da: Lic.iur. __________ __________, __________,

interposta al decreto d’accusa n. DA __________/__________ di data __________ 2003 del Procuratore pubblico Rosa Item, __________,

preso atto del ritiro della suddetta opposizione con lettera 25 settembre 2003 visti gli art. 210 e 211 CPP,

decreta: 1. Il procedimento penale a carico di _________ _______________ __________ è stralciato dai ruoli e il decreto d'accusa diventa esecutivo.

2. Nei confronti di __________ __________ si procederà separatamente e il dibattimento già aggiornato avrà quindi luogo.

3. La tassa di giustizia di fr. 50.00 e le spese relative alla presente decisione di fr. 30.00 sono a carico dell'opponente.

4. Intimazione a:

__________, Via __________, __________, __________, Via __________ __________ Procuratore pubblico Rosa Item, Via __________, __________, __________ SA, _________ ___________, __________, __________ SA __________ Sud, __________, Lic.iur. __________ __________, Via ____________________ __________,

Il giudice: La segretaria:

Giovanni Celio

p.p. Marco Ambrosini

Distinta spese: Tasse giustizia fr. 50.00

Spese fr.

30.00

Totale fr. 80.00