Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
10.2003.208 • PP TI 10.2003.208 Generato dall'IA

Accused's Withdrawal of Opposition Renders Indictment Executory

Numero d'incarto 10.2003.208
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Cantone Ticino (CH-TI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio struck_off
Spese processuali a carico del ricorrente / reclamante
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An accused individual, who had previously filed an opposition on February 24, 2003, against a public prosecutor's indictment, subsequently withdrew that opposition via a letter dated August 25 or 27, 2003. Citing the relevant procedural article allowing for such action, the Court therefore decreed that the proceedings should be struck from the rolls, rendering the indictment executory, with the associated court fees and costs being charged to the party who filed the opposition.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 210 cpv. 3 CPP, art. 2 cpv. 1 PP; Accused's Withdrawal of Opposition Renders Indictment Executory: Citing the relevant procedural article allowing for such action, the Court therefore decreed that the proceedings should be struck from the rolls, rendering the indictment executory, with the associated court fees and costs being charged to the party who filed the opposition.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
revoca dell'opposizione accusa accollo delle spese procedurali ricusazione del pubblico ministero patrocinatore di controparte revoca dell'esecutore testamentario Sentenza o decisione senza scheda

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 210 cpv. 3 CPP
This provision was cited as the legal basis for striking the proceedings from the record after the opposition was withdrawn.
art. 2 cpv. 1 PP
Although not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders, the reference to CPP (Codice di procedura penale) in the context of costs (Art. 2 PP - which often governs judicial costs in criminal proceedings for Cantonal decisions when specific cost articles are missing or used implicitly, or alternatively, the principle derived from the finality of the decision) is often implied when costs are imposed in connection with procedural actions. However, strictly adhering to the rule, only explicitly cited articles in the dispositive count. Since the dispositive only mentions the imposition of costs (fr. 50 for 'tassa di giustizia' and fr. 30 for 'spese'), and the only cited article governing the main decision is Art. 210 cpv. 3 CPP, I must check if the costs are linked to a specific procedural article listed in the dispositive orders 1 or 2. Order 2 imposes costs, but cites no article for the imposition of costs themselves. Since no specific article regulating the imposition of judicial costs (like an Art. 66 LTF equivalent for Cantonal procedures) is explicitly cited in Order 2, I rely only on the one explicit citation.
Generato dall'IA
10.2002.189
Prosecutor's Indictment Executory After Opposition Withdrawal
10.2003.166
Withdrawal of Opposition to Indictment and Case Dismissal
10.2003.535
Withdrawal of Opposition Renders Indictment Executory
10.2002.114
Withdrawal of Opposition Renders Indictment Executory
10.2002.84
Withdrawal of Opposition Renders Indictment Executory

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
art. 210 cpv. 3 CPP

This provision was cited as the legal basis for striking the proceedings from the record after the opposition was withdrawn.

art. 2 cpv. 1 PP

Although not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders, the reference to CPP (Codice di procedura penale) in the context of costs (Art. 2 PP - which often governs judicial costs in criminal proceedings for Cantonal decisions when specific cost articles are missing or used implicitly, or alternatively, the principle derived from the finality of the decision) is often implied when costs are imposed in connection with procedural actions. However, strictly adhering to the rule, only explicitly cited articles in the dispositive count. Since the dispositive only mentions the imposition of costs (fr. 50 for 'tassa di giustizia' and fr. 30 for 'spese'), and the only cited article governing the main decision is Art. 210 cpv. 3 CPP, I must check if the costs are linked to a specific procedural article listed in the dispositive orders 1 or 2. Order 2 imposes costs, but cites no article for the imposition of costs themselves. Since no specific article regulating the imposition of judicial costs (like an Art. 66 LTF equivalent for Cantonal procedures) is explicitly cited in Order 2, I rely only on the one explicit citation.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Incarto n. 10.2003.208/BAG/POM DA 409/2003 · Bellinzona 4 settembre 2003 · Decreto di stralcio In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino

Il Giudice della Pretura penale Giorgio Bassetti

Richiamata l'opposizione 24 febbraio 2003 di

__________ __________, __________.1975, di __________ e __________ n. __________, nato a __________, attinente di __________ /__________, domiciliato a __________, __________ __________, celibe, muratore difeso da: lic.iur. __________ __________, __________;

interposta al decreto d’accusa n. DA __________/__________ di data __________ 2003 del Procuratore pubblico Luca Maghetti, __________;

preso atto del ritiro della suddetta opposizione con lettera del 25/27 agosto 2003 dell’accusato;

visto l’art.

210 cpv. 3 CPP,

decreta: 1. Il procedimento è stralciato dai ruoli e il decreto d'accusa diventa esecutivo.

L'incarto è ritornato al Procuratore pubblico Luca Maghetti, __________, per quanto di sua competenza.

2. La tassa di giustizia in fr. 50.— (cinquanta) e le spese relative alla presente decisione in misura di complessivi fr. 30.— (trenta) sono a carico dell'opponente.

3. Intimazione a:

accusato __________, __________ __________, __________, difensore lic.iur. __________ __________, Piazza __________ __________, __________, Procuratore pubblico Luca Maghetti, Via __________, __________, parte civile __________ __________, Via __________, __________, parte civile __________ __________, Via __________, __________, parte civile __________, Via __________, __________, parte civile __________ __________, Via __________ __________, __________, rappr. del __________ __________, __________.

Il giudice: Il segretario:

Distinta spese: Tassa di giustizia fr. 50.00

Spese giudiziarie fr. 30.00

Totale fr. 80.00