Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
10.2002.265 • PP TI 10.2002.265 Generato dall'IA

Public Prosecutor v. Accused: Withdrawal of Opposition and Discontinuation of Proceedings

Numero d'incarto 10.2002.265
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Cantone Ticino (CH-TI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio struck_off
Spese processuali a carico del ricorrente / reclamante
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

In a criminal proceeding initiated by a public prosecutor's indictment, the accused person had previously filed an opposition but subsequently withdrew that opposition via a letter dated January 17, 2003; consequently, the court, referencing articles 210 and 211 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, decreed the discontinuation of the proceedings from the records, rendering the original indictment executory, and ordered the opponent to bear the associated court fees and a fine of 50 Swiss Francs.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

art. 210 CPP, art. 211 CPP, art. 2 n. 1, art. 2 n. 2; Public Prosecutor v. Accused: Withdrawal of Opposition and Discontinuation of Proceedings: In a criminal proceeding initiated by a public prosecutor's indictment, the accused person had previously filed an opposition but subsequently withdrew that opposition via a letter dated January 17, 2003; consequently, the court, referencing articles 210 and 211 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, decreed the discontinuation of the proceedings from the records, rendering the original indictment executory, and ordered the opponent to bear the associated court fees and a fine of 50 Swiss Francs.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
revoca dell'opposizione abbandono del procedimento accusa codice di procedura penale ricusazione del pubblico ministero reati contro la pubblica autorità Sentenza o decisione senza scheda

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
art. 210 CPP
Cited as the basis for striking the proceeding from the rolls following the withdrawal of the opposition.
art. 211 CPP
Cited as the basis for striking the proceeding from the rolls following the withdrawal of the opposition.
art. 2 n. 1
This reference is not explicitly present in the dispositive. Based on context, it is likely referring to a procedural rule for costs which is applied in order 2, but the exact provision number (like Art. X) is missing or implied. Since the rule demands explicit citation, and only order 2 mentions costs without citing a specific procedural rule for imposing them (only stating the costs are charged), I must rely only on the explicitly cited articles in orders 1 and 2.
art. 2 n. 2
This reference is not explicitly present in the dispositive. See reasoning above.
Generato dall'IA
10.2003.40
Criminal Proceedings Struck Following Withdrawn Opposition
10.2003.620
Withdrawal of Opposition to Indictment and Subsequent Dismissal of Proceedings
10.2002.145
Discontinuation of Proceedings Following Withdrawal of Opposition to Accusation Decree
10.2003.93
Prosecutor v. Accused: Withdrawal of Opposition and Case Removal
10.2003.650
Withdrawal of Opposition to Indictment and Striking of Proceedings

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
art. 210 CPP

Cited as the basis for striking the proceeding from the rolls following the withdrawal of the opposition.

art. 211 CPP

Cited as the basis for striking the proceeding from the rolls following the withdrawal of the opposition.

art. 2 n. 1

This reference is not explicitly present in the dispositive. Based on context, it is likely referring to a procedural rule for costs which is applied in order 2, but the exact provision number (like Art. X) is missing or implied. Since the rule demands explicit citation, and only order 2 mentions costs without citing a specific procedural rule for imposing them (only stating the costs are charged), I must rely only on the explicitly cited articles in orders 1 and 2.

art. 2 n. 2

This reference is not explicitly present in the dispositive. See reasoning above.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Incarto n. 10.2002.265/fc DAC 343/2002 · Bellinzona 3 febbraio 2003 · Decreto di stralcio In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino

Il Giudice della Pretura penale Marco Ambrosini

Richiamata l'opposizione 21 maggio 2002 di

__________ __________, __________.1962, di __________ e __________ n. __________, nato a __________, cittadino marocchino/nigeriano, domiciliato a __________ __________, celibe, difeso da: Avv. __________ __________, __________,

interposta al decreto d’accusa n. __________/__________ di data __________ 2002 del Procuratore pubblico Fiorenza Bergomi, __________,

preso atto del ritiro della suddetta opposizione con lettera 17 gennaio 2003 visti gli art. 210 e 211 CPP,

decreta: 1. Il procedimento è stralciato dai ruoli e il decreto d'accusa diventa esecutivo.

L'incarto è ritornato al Procuratore pubblico Fiorenza Bergomi, __________, per quanto di sua competenza.

2. La tassa di giustizia di fr. 50.-- e le spese relative al presente decreto, sono a carico dell'opponente.

3. Intimazione a:

- __________ __________, __________ __________, - Procuratore pubblico Fiorenza Bergomi, Via __________ __________, __________, - __________ __________, Via __________, __________, - __________ __________, __________ __________, __________, - __________ __________, Av. __________ __________ , __________, - __________ __________, __________ __________, __________, - __________ __________, __________ __________, __________, - __________ __________ __________, Via __________ __________, __________, - __________ __________, __________, __________, - __________ /__________, __________, - __________ & __________. SA, Via __________ __________, __________, - __________ __________ __________, __________ , __________ __________, - Avv. __________ __________, __________, __________,

Il giudice: La segretaria:

Distanta spese: Tassa di giustizia fr. 50.--

Spese giudiziarie fr. 50.--

Totale fr. 100.--