Case Transfer Due to Jurisdiction and Consolidation
Svizzera · Cantone Ticino (CH-TI)
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAA criminal proceeding was initiated against an individual for multiple offenses, including simple bodily harm, battery, theft, insult, threats, public intimidation, and various traffic and transport violations. The court ruled to remove this case from its docket and transfer the file to the Cantonal Criminal Tribunal because the present procedure needed to be joined with another pending case before that higher court, thereby determining that the Cantonal Criminal Tribunal possessed the appropriate jurisdiction for the consolidated proceedings.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAArt. 123 Cifra, Art. 126 cpv. 1 CP, Art. 139 Cifra, Art. 177 CP, Art. 180 CP, Art. 258 CP; Case Transfer Due to Jurisdiction and Consolidation: The court ruled to remove this case from its docket and transfer the file to the Cantonal Criminal Tribunal because the present procedure needed to be joined with another pending case before that higher court, thereby determining that the Cantonal Criminal Tribunal possessed the appropriate jurisdiction for the consolidated proceedings.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAQuestioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator
Generato dall'IAThis provision is cited in the context of the charges against the accused, which led to the decision to transfer the case.
This provision is cited in the context of the charges against the accused, which led to the decision to transfer the case.
This provision is cited in the context of the charges against the accused, which led to the decision to transfer the case.
This provision is cited in the context of the charges against the accused, which led to the decision to transfer the case.
This provision is cited in the context of the charges against the accused, which led to the decision to transfer the case.
This provision is cited in the context of the charges against the accused, which led to the decision to transfer the case.
This provision is cited in the context of the charges against the accused, which led to the decision to transfer the case.
This provision is cited in the context of the charges against the accused, which led to the decision to transfer the case.
This provision is cited in the context of the charges against the accused, which led to the decision to transfer the case.
This provision is cited in the context of the charges against the accused, which led to the decision to transfer the case.
This provision is cited in the context of the charges against the accused, which led to the decision to transfer the case.
This provision is cited in the context of the charges against the accused, which led to the decision to transfer the case.
This provision is cited in the context of the charges against the accused, which led to the decision to transfer the case.
Testo completo
Incarto n. 10.2002.264/AMM DAC 351/2002 · Bellinzona 18 dicembre 2003 · Stralcio e trasmissione atti In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino
Il Giudice della Pretura penale Marco Ambrosini
sedente con la segretaria Laura Rossini per statuire nella procedura penale avviata nei confronti di
__________ __________, __________.1983, di __________ e __________ n. __________, nato a __________ /__________, attinente di __________ /__________, domiciliato a __________, Via __________ __________, celibe, apprendista meccanico patr. da: Avv. __________ __________, __________ __________,
accusato di Lesioni semplici, Vie di fatto, Furto, Ingiuria, Minaccia, Pubblica intimidazione, Condurre un veicolo difettoso, Conducenti senza licenza di condurre, Condurre senza licenza di circolazione o targhe di controllo, Conducenti senza l'assicurazione di responsabilità civile, Contravvenzione alla LF sul trasporto pubblico, Condurre un ciclomotore senza licenza di circolazione e senza targa di controllo, Condurre un ciclomotore senza assicurazione di responsabilità civile (caso poco gravità);
reati previsti dall' Art. 123 Cifra 1 CP, Art. 126 cpv. 1 CP, Art. 139 Cifra 1 CP, Art. 177 CP, Art. 180 CP, Art. 258 CP, Art. 93 Cifra 2 cpv. 1 LCS, Art. 95 Cifra 1 LCS, Art. 96 Cifra 1 LCS, Art. 96 Cifra 2 cpv. 1 LCS, Art. 51 LTP, Art. 145 Cifra 3 OAC, Art. 145 Cifra 4 OAC;
e meglio come al decreto d’accusa n. DAC __________/__________ di data __________ 2002 del Procuratore pubblico Antonio Perugini, __________,
ritenuto che la procedura in esame deve essere congiunta con altra procedura pendente presso il Tribunale penale cantonale;
che il presente procedimento deve perciò essere stralciato dai ruoli;
pronuncia: 1. Il procedimento penale promosso con DAC __________/__________ contro __________ __________, __________.1983, __________, è stralciato dai ruoli.
2. L'incarto è trasmesso per competenza al Tribunale penale cantonale.
3. Intimazione a:
– __________ __________, __________, – avv. __________ __________, __________, – Procuratore pubblico Antonio Perugini, __________, – Procuratore pubblico Nicola Respini, __________, – Tribunale penale cantonale, __________, – __________, __________, – __________ __________, __________.
Il giudice: La segretaria: