Withdrawal of Complaint Leading to Case Dismissal
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe case involved an opposition filed by a defendant against a public prosecutor's accusation decree, but the proceedings were terminated because the complainant formally withdrew their complaint via letter. Citing the relevant articles of the Penal Code concerning the discontinuation of proceedings when a complaint is withdrawn, the court decreed that the case be struck from the rolls, returning the file to the public prosecutor for further action within their competence, and ordered that no fees or costs be levied.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAart. 217 cpv. 1 CPS, art. 31 cpv. 1 CPS, art. 31 cpv. 2 CPS, Non si prelevano né tasse né spese; Withdrawal of Complaint Leading to Case Dismissal: Citing the relevant articles of the Penal Code concerning the discontinuation of proceedings when a complaint is withdrawn, the court decreed that the case be struck from the rolls, returning the file to the public prosecutor for further action within their competence, and ordered that no fees or costs be levied.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAQuestioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator
Generato dall'IACited in order 1 as the procedural basis for striking the case from the rolls following the withdrawal of the complaint.
Cited in order 1 as the procedural basis for striking the case from the rolls following the withdrawal of the complaint.
Cited in order 1 as the procedural basis for striking the case from the rolls following the withdrawal of the complaint.
Order 2 explicitly states that no fees or costs will be levied.
Testo completo
Incarto n. 10.2002.25/fc DAP 2217/2002 · Bellinzona 3 marzo 2003 · Stralcio In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino
Il Giudice della Pretura penale
Marco Ambrosini
Richiamata l'opposizione 25
settembre 2002 di
__________ __________ __________ __________, __________, fu __________ e __________ n. __________, nato a __________, __________, domiciliato a __________, __________ __________ __________ __________, coniugato, __________ difeso da: Avv. __________ __________, __________,
interposta
al decreto d’accusa n. DAP __________ 2002 del Procuratore pubblico Antonio
Perugini, __________,
preso atto del
ritiro della querela con lettera del patrocinatore della querelante di data 27
febbraio 2003;
visti gli
art. 31 cpv. 1 e 217 cpv. 1 CPS,
decreta: 1. Il
procedimento è stralciato dai ruoli.
L'incarto
è ritornato al Procuratore pubblico Antonio Perugini, __________, per quanto di sua competenza.
2. Non
si prelevano né tasse né spese
3. Intimazione
a:
__________ __________ __________ __________, __________ __________ __________ __________, __________, Procuratore pubblico Antonio Perugini, __________ __________ __________ __________, __________, __________ __________ __________, __________ __________ __________, __________, Avv. __________ __________, __________ __________ __________, __________, Avv. __________ __________, __________ __________ __________ __________, __________ ____________________,
Il giudice: La
segretaria: