Withdrawal of Opposition Leads to Case Dismissal and Restoration of Accusation Decree
Svizzera · Cantone Ticino (CH-TI)
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAIn a criminal proceeding initiated by a public prosecutor's accusation decree, the defendant had previously filed an opposition, but subsequently withdrew that opposition during the hearing. Based on the withdrawal of the opposition and in accordance with relevant procedural articles, the court decreed that the proceeding be struck from the rolls, rendering the original accusation decree executive, and returned the file to the public prosecutor for further action, while waiving justice fees and assigning costs to the State.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAart. 210 e 211 CPP, Art. 210 CPP, Art. 211 CPP; Withdrawal of Opposition Leads to Case Dismissal and Restoration of Accusation Decree: Based on the withdrawal of the opposition and in accordance with relevant procedural articles, the court decreed that the proceeding be struck from the rolls, rendering the original accusation decree executive, and returned the file to the public prosecutor for further action, while waiving justice fees and assigning costs to the State.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAQuestioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator
Generato dall'IAThese articles were cited as the basis for the procedural decision to strike the case from the rolls following the withdrawal of the opposition.
This article governs the effects of withdrawing an appeal or opposition, leading to the deeming of the charging decree as final.
This article likely governs the procedural outcome when the act mentioned in Art. 210 occurs, leading to the striking of the case and enforcement of the decree.
The dispositive includes a ruling on costs, stating that no judicial fee is charged and costs are borne by the State.
Testo completo
Incarto n. 10.2002.225/AMM DAC 537/2002 · Bellinzona 18 marzo 2003 · Stralcio In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino
Il Giudice della Pretura penale
Marco Ambrosini
Richiamata l'opposizione 13 agosto 2002 di
__________ __________, di __________ e __________ -__________ __________ n. __________, nato il __________ 1971 a __________, attinente di __________, celibe, grafico, domiciliato a __________, __________ __________ (difeso dall'avv. __________ __________, __________),
interposta
al decreto d’accusa DAC __________/__________ di data __________ 2002 del Procuratore
pubblico Antonio Perugini, __________,
preso atto del
ritiro della suddetta opposizione con dichiarazione resa durante il dibattimento
odierno,
visti gli
art. 210 e 211 CPP,
decreta: 1. Il
procedimento è stralciato dai ruoli e il decreto d'accusa diventa esecutivo.
L'incarto
è ritornato al Procuratore pubblico Antonio Perugini, __________, per quanto di sua competenza.
2. Non
si preleva tassa di giustizia; le spese sono a carico dello Stato.
3. Intimazione
a:
– __________ __________, per il tramite del difensore, – avv. __________ __________, Via __________ __________, __________, – Procuratore pubblico Antonio Perugini, __________.
Il giudice: Il
cancelliere: