Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
10.2002.22 • PP TI 10.2002.22 Generato dall'IA

Withdrawal of Complaint Leads to Case Dismissal

Numero d'incarto 10.2002.22
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Cantone Ticino (CH-TI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio struck_off
Spese processuali senza spese
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Following an objection filed against a prosecutor's indictment, the court decided to strike the case from the rolls because the charging party formally withdrew their complaint via letter, citing the legal provisions that permit the termination of proceedings under such circumstances, and subsequently ordered that no fees or costs be levied.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 31 cpv.1, art. 31 cpv.1 e 139 cifra 4 CP, art. 139 cifra 4 CP, art. 31 cpv.1 CP; Withdrawal of Complaint Leads to Case Dismissal: Following an objection filed against a prosecutor's indictment, the court decided to strike the case from the rolls because the charging party formally withdrew their complaint via letter, citing the legal provisions that permit the termination of proceedings under such circumstances, and subsequently ordered that no fees or costs be levied.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
stralcio del procedimento accusa ritiro delle conclusioni civili abbandono per lesioni personali revoca dell'opposizione ricusazione del pubblico ministero Sentenza o decisione senza scheda

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 31 cpv.1
art. 31 cpv.1 e 139 cifra 4 CP,
art. 31 cpv.1 e 139 cifra 4 CP
These articles formed the legal basis for the decision to strike the proceedings from the record (stralciato dai ruoli).
art. 139 cifra 4 CP
This provision is cited as part of the grounds justifying the dismissal/striking of the proceedings based on the withdrawal of the complaint.
art. 31 cpv.1 CP
This provision is cited as part of the grounds justifying the dismissal/striking of the proceedings.
Generato dall'IA
10.2002.25
Withdrawal of Complaint Leading to Case Dismissal
10.2003.320
Case Dismissal Upon Withdrawal of Complaint
10.2003.236
Withdrawal of Complaint Leading to Case Dismissal
10.2003.400
Withdrawal of Complaint Leads to Case Dismissal
10.2003.103
Withdrawal of Complaint Leading to Dismissal of Indictment

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
art. 31 cpv.1 e 139 cifra 4 CP

These articles formed the legal basis for the decision to strike the proceedings from the record (stralciato dai ruoli).

art. 139 cifra 4 CP

This provision is cited as part of the grounds justifying the dismissal/striking of the proceedings based on the withdrawal of the complaint.

art. 31 cpv.1 CP

This provision is cited as part of the grounds justifying the dismissal/striking of the proceedings.

art. 31 cpv.1 CP

This provision is cited as part of the grounds justifying the dismissal/striking of the proceedings.

art. 139 cifra 4 CP

This provision is cited as part of the grounds justifying the dismissal/striking of the proceedings based on the withdrawal of the complaint.

art. 31 cpv.1 CP

This provision is cited as part of the grounds justifying the dismissal/striking of the proceedings.

art. 139 cifra 4 CP

This provision is cited as part of the grounds justifying the dismissal/striking of the proceedings based on the withdrawal of the complaint.

art. 31 cpv.1 CP

This provision is cited as part of the grounds justifying the dismissal/striking of the proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Incarto n. 10.2002.22/fc DAP 390/2000 · Bellinzona 24 febbraio 2003 · Stralcio In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino

Il Giudice della Pretura penale

Marco Ambrosini

Richiamata l'opposizione 1 marzo

2000 di

__________ __________, nato il __________, fu __________ e fu __________ n. __________, nato a __________, attinente di __________, domiciliato a __________, __________ __________ __________ __________ __________, separato, __________

interposta

al decreto d’accusa n. DAP __________ 2000 del Procuratore generale Luca Marcellini, __________,

preso atto del

ritiro della querela con lettera del 19 febbraio 2003

visti gli

art. 31 cpv.1 e 139 cifra 4 CP,

decreta: 1. Il

procedimento è stralciato dai ruoli.

L'incarto

è ritornato al Ministero Pubblico,

__________, per quanto di sua competenza.

2. Non

si prelevano né tasse né spese.

3. Intimazione

a:

__________ __________, __________ __________ __________ __________ __________, __________, Ministero Pubblico, Via Pretorio 16, Lugano, __________ __________ __________, __________ __________ __________, __________, Avv. __________ __________, __________ __________ __________ __________, __________,

Il giudice: La

segretaria: