Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
10.2002.186 • PP TI 10.2002.186 Generato dall'IA

Withdrawal of Opposition to Accusation Decree

Numero d'incarto 10.2002.186
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Cantone Ticino (CH-TI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio struck_off
Spese processuali a carico del ricorrente / reclamante
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An individual had filed an opposition on May 11, 2001, against a public prosecutor's accusation decree dated May 7, 2001; however, the court issued a striking order because the opponent subsequently withdrew this opposition via a letter dated January 10, 2003, thereby causing the accusation decree to become legally enforceable under articles 210 and 211 of the relevant criminal procedure code, with the opponent being charged a judicial fee and costs related to the striking decree.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 210 CPP, Art. 211 CPP, Art. 348 DAC; Withdrawal of Opposition to Accusation Decree: An individual had filed an opposition on May 11, 2001, against a public prosecutor's accusation decree dated May 7, 2001; however, the court issued a striking order because the opponent subsequently withdrew this opposition via a letter dated January 10, 2003, thereby causing the accusation decree to become legally enforceable under articles 210 and 211 of the relevant criminal procedure code, with the opponent being charged a judicial fee and costs related to the striking decree.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
revoca dell'opposizione codice di procedura penale ricusazione del pubblico ministero censure procedurali azione in revoca denuncia mendace Sentenza o decisione senza scheda

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 210 CPP
Cited as the legal basis for declaring the procedure struck from the rolls following the withdrawal of the opposition.
Art. 211 CPP
Cited as the legal basis, in conjunction with Art. 210 CPP, for the resultant execution of the indictment.
Art. 348 DAC
The decision refers to the article governing court fees, though the specific article for costs imposed in the dispositive is not explicitly cited there, only in the preamble's context (as the decision is a 'Decreto di stralcio' which often references internal procedural rules for costs, but based strictly on the dispositive, only the CPP articles are strictly necessary for the main ruling).
Generato dall'IA
10.2003.374
Withdrawal of Opposition to Accusation Decree
10.2002.294
Withdrawal of Opposition to Accusation Decree
10.2003.401
Withdrawal of Opposition to Accusation Decree
10.2003.336
Withdrawal of Opposition to Accusation Decree and Dismissal of Proceedings
10.2003.583
Withdrawal of Opposition to Accusation Decree and Striking of Proceedings

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 210 CPP

Cited as the legal basis for declaring the procedure struck from the rolls following the withdrawal of the opposition.

Art. 211 CPP

Cited as the legal basis, in conjunction with Art. 210 CPP, for the resultant execution of the indictment.

Art. 348 DAC

The decision refers to the article governing court fees, though the specific article for costs imposed in the dispositive is not explicitly cited there, only in the preamble's context (as the decision is a 'Decreto di stralcio' which often references internal procedural rules for costs, but based strictly on the dispositive, only the CPP articles are strictly necessary for the main ruling).

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Incarto n. 10.2002.186/fc DAC 348/2001 · Bellinzona 3 febbraio 2003 · Decreto di stralcio In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino

Il Presidente della Pretura penale Marco Kraushaar

Richiamata l'opposizione 11 maggio 2001 di

__________ __________, __________.__________.1962, di __________ e __________ n. __________, nata a __________ /__________, attinente di __________ /__________, domiciliata a __________, Via __________ degli __________ __________, nubile, impiegata

interposta al decreto d’accusa n. __________/__________ di data 7 maggio 2001 del Procuratore pubblico Antonio Perugini, __________,

preso atto del ritiro della suddetta opposizione con lettera 10 gennaio 2003 visti gli art. 210 e 211 CPP,

decreta: 1. Il procedimento è stralciato dai ruoli e il decreto d'accusa diventa esecutivo.

L'incarto è ritornato al Procuratore pubblico Antonio Perugini, __________, per quanto di sua competenza.

2. La tassa di giustizia di fr. 50.-- e le spese relative al presente decreto, sono a carico dell'opponente.

3. Intimazione a:

- __________ __________, Via __________ degli __________ __________, __________, - Procuratore pubblico Antonio Perugini, __________ __________ __________ __________, __________,

Il presidente: La segretaria:

Distinta spese: Tassa di giustizia fr. 50.--

Spese giudiziarie fr. 50.--

Totale fr. 100.--