Prosecutor's Indictment Finalized Upon Opposition Withdrawal
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAIn response to an opposition filed against a public prosecutor's bill of indictment, the criminal court judge issued a dismissal order after the opponent formally withdrew the opposition during the criminal hearing, pursuant to articles 210 and 211 of the Code of Criminal Procedure; consequently, the proceedings were struck from the record, the bill of indictment became final and enforceable, and the opponent was ordered to bear the court fees and related costs.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAart. 210 CPP, art. 211 CPP, Art. 3; Prosecutor's Indictment Finalized Upon Opposition Withdrawal: In response to an opposition filed against a public prosecutor's bill of indictment, the criminal court judge issued a dismissal order after the opponent formally withdrew the opposition during the criminal hearing, pursuant to articles 210 and 211 of the Code of Criminal Procedure; consequently, the proceedings were struck from the record, the bill of indictment became final and enforceable, and the opponent was ordered to bear the court fees and related costs.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAQuestioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator
Generato dall'IAThis article was cited as the legal basis for striking the proceedings from the record following the withdrawal of the opposition.
This article was cited as the legal basis for the decree, specifically regarding the consequences of the withdrawal, making the indictment executory.
This order imposes the court costs (tassa di giustizia e spese) on the opponent, which is a cost/expense provision implicitly governed by procedural rules.
Testo completo
Incarto n. 10.2002.174 DAP 1947/2002 · Bellinzona 6 febbraio 2003 · Decreto di stralcio In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino
Il Giudice della Pretura penale
Marco Ambrosini
Richiamata l'opposizione 30 agosto
2002 di
__________ __________, __________.__________.1973, di __________ __________ e __________ __________ n. __________, nato a __________ __________ /__________, attinente di __________ /__________, domiciliato a __________ Inferiore, Via __________. __________ __________, celibe, disoccupato difeso da: lic.iur. __________ __________, __________,
interposta
al decreto d’accusa DAP __________ del Procuratore pubblico Antonio Perugini, __________,
preso atto del
ritiro della suddetta opposizione con dichiarazione resa durante il
dibattimento penale del 6 febbraio 2003,
visti gli
art. 210 e 211 CPP,
decreta: 1. Il
procedimento è stralciato dai ruoli e il decreto d'accusa diventa esecutivo.
2. L'incarto
è ritornato al Procuratore pubblico Antonio Perugini, __________, per quanto di sua competenza.
3. La
tassa di giustizia di fr. 100.– e le spese relative al presente decreto sono a
carico dell'opponente.
4. Intimazione
a:
__________ __________, Via __________ __________, __________ __________, Procuratore pubblico Antonio Perugini, __________ __________ __________ __________, __________, Lic.iur. __________ __________, __________ __________ __________, __________,
Il giudice: La
segretaria:
Distinta
spese: Tassa di giustizia fr. 100.–
Spese
giudiziarie fr. 50.–
Totale fr. 150.–