Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
SK 03 15 • KG LU SK 03 15 KI-generiert

Enforcement of Child Support and Spousal Support by Alimony Collection Agency

Geschäftsnummer SK 03 15
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Luzern (CH-LU)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The court determined that there is no distinction between the enforcement procedures for final child support and post-marital spousal support payments, affirming the lower court's decision that the local alimony collection agency was authorized to represent a spouse in enforcement actions, including the legal opening proceedings for debt collection. The reasoning established that Article 131 (1) of the Civil Code, read in conjunction with the relevant cantonal Social Assistance Act provision, provides a sufficient legal basis, overriding the general lawyers' monopoly by delegating authority to the cantonal agency to assist in the execution of support claims, which is consistent with the legislative intent to facilitate the enforcement of family law claims and avoid unnecessary state costs associated with mandatory attorney representation in these cases.

Legislator-Regeste

Amtlich

Art. 80 ff. SchKG; Art. 131 Abs. 1 ZGB; § 44 Abs. 2 SHG (Sozialhilfegesetz, SRL Nr. 892); § 46 Abs. 2 ZPO; § 6 AnwG (Anwaltsgesetz, SRL Nr. 280). Zwischen rechtskräftig geschuldeten Kinder- und nachehelichen Ehegattenalimenten besteht betreffend das Alimenteninkasso (inkl. Vollstreckungsverfahren) kein Unterschied. Art. 131 Abs. 1 ZGB bietet eine ausreichende gesetzliche Grundlage dafür, dass die Alimenten-Inkassostellen im Kanton Luzern gestützt auf § 44 Abs. 2 SHG berechtigt sind, Ehegatten bei der Vollstreckung ihrer persönlichen Unterhaltsbeiträge, somit auch im Rechtsöffnungsverfahren, zu vertreten. Das Anwaltsmonopol wird insoweit durchbrochen | Schuldbetreibungs- und Konkursrecht

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Vollstreckung von Kinderalimenten Inkasso Anwaltshonorar nacheheliche Unterhaltspflicht Anweisung Ehegatte

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 131 Abs. 1 ZGB
Cited as the sufficient legal basis granting Alimenten-Inkassostellen the right to represent spouses in enforcement proceedings.
Art. 131 ZGB
Art. 131 Abs. 3 ZGB
Art. 129 Abs. 1 ZGB
§ 44 Abs. 2 SHG
Cited as the cantonal provision under which the Alimenten-Inkassostellen are authorized, based on Art. 131 Abs. 1 ZGB, to represent spouses in enforcement proceedings.
Art. 66 Abs. 1 LTF
This provision is not explicitly cited in the dispositive, which in this case is the main decision section detailing the ruling. However, if the decision implies an award of costs following a ruling on the merits, this article typically governs the costs in federal proceedings (though this case is from an Obergericht, which is a cantonal court; assuming the reference refers to the Cantonal Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO) or a similar cost provision if the decision were final at the federal level. Since the actual dispositive is missing specific cost orders citing a procedural code, and the provided text only lists articles in the summary/introductory part which is then confirmed in section 4.4, I will only list those confirmed in the reasoning summary):

Zitierte Rechtsprechung

KI-generiert
BGE 121 I 60
Constitutional Right to Legal Aid in Debt Enforcement Proceedings
BGE 109 Ia 72
Federal Supreme Court Ruling on Youth Secretariat's Authority in Debt Enforcement of Child Maintenance
BGE 121 I 101
BGE 122 I 207
KI-generiert
OG 1991 42
Child Support Enforcement Standing of Custodial Parent
22 09 30
Spousal Maintenance Obligations and Pre-litigation Cost Advances in Ongoing Marriages
OG 1994 43
Debt Enforcement Authorization Following Divorce Settlement Alimony Reduction Dispute
3B 17 41
Spousal and Child Support Calculation Clarifications
3B 16 19
Spousal Support Obligation and Ancillary Support for Pre-Marital Child

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 131 Abs. 1 ZGB

Cited as the sufficient legal basis granting Alimenten-Inkassostellen the right to represent spouses in enforcement proceedings.

§ 44 Abs. 2 SHG

Cited as the cantonal provision under which the Alimenten-Inkassostellen are authorized, based on Art. 131 Abs. 1 ZGB, to represent spouses in enforcement proceedings.

Art. 66 Abs. 1 LTF

This provision is not explicitly cited in the dispositive, which in this case is the main decision section detailing the ruling. However, if the decision implies an award of costs following a ruling on the merits, this article typically governs the costs in federal proceedings (though this case is from an Obergericht, which is a cantonal court; assuming the reference refers to the Cantonal Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO) or a similar cost provision if the decision were final at the federal level. Since the actual dispositive is missing specific cost orders citing a procedural code, and the provided text only lists articles in the summary/introductory part which is then confirmed in section 4.4, I will only list those confirmed in the reasoning summary):

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · Schuldbetreibungs- und Konkurskommission

Rechtsgebiet: · Schuldbetreibungs- und Konkursrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 11.02.2003

Fallnummer: · SK 03 15

LGVE: · 2003 I Nr. 52

Leitsatz: · Art. 80 ff. SchKG; Art. 131 Abs. 1 ZGB; § 44 Abs. 2 SHG (Sozialhilfegesetz, SRL Nr. 892); § 46 Abs. 2 ZPO; § 6 AnwG (Anwaltsgesetz, SRL Nr. 280). Zwischen rechtskräftig geschuldeten Kinder- und nachehelichen Ehegattenalimenten besteht betreffend das Alimenteninkasso (inkl. Vollstreckungsverfahren) kein Unterschied. Art. 131 Abs. 1 ZGB bietet eine ausreichende gesetzliche Grundlage dafür, dass die Alimenten-Inkassostellen im Kanton Luzern gestützt auf § 44 Abs. 2 SHG berechtigt sind, Ehegatten bei der Vollstreckung ihrer persönlichen Unterhaltsbeiträge, somit auch im Rechtsöffnungsverfahren, zu vertreten. Das Anwaltsmonopol wird insoweit durchbrochen

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.