Conviction Upheld; Forensic Measure Denied Due to Timing of Abnormal Mental State

The appellate court upheld the criminal conviction and sentencing for offenses committed in 2006, but declined to order a forensic measure under Articles 59 ff. of the Penal Code because, despite a subsequent psychological disorder diagnosed from 2008 onward requiring outpatient treatment, the expert opinion established that the defendant's abnormal mental state did not exist at the time of the offense, meaning the crimes were not a manifestation of the current psychopathology. The court reasoned that for a measure to be imposed, the abnormal mental state must have existed at the time of the criminal act, although any later-emerging disorder might be relevant during the execution of the sentence.