Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
21 08 123 • KG LU 21 08 123 KI-generiert

Dormicum Offenses: Quantitatively Severe Case Upheld

Geschäftsnummer 21 08 123
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Luzern (CH-LU)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The appellate court upheld the lower court's decision that the defendant's offenses involving the drug Dormicum constituted a quantitatively severe case under Article 19 Paragraph 2 lit. a of the Narcotics Act. The court reasoned that the threshold for a severe case, previously established by 1999 expert opinions based on the psychoactive substance Midazolam's potential for dependency and lethal mixed intoxications (set at 27 or 36 grams), remained valid despite the age of the reports, as the defendant provided no new scientific evidence to discredit them, and current knowledge confirms the significant dangers and risks associated with benzodiazepines like Midazolam, noting that the defendant significantly exceeded the threshold quantity of 2,400 tablets (36,000 mg).

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 19 Ziff. 2 lit. a BetmG, Art. 1 BetmG, Art. 19 Ziff. 1 BetmG; Dormicum Offenses: Quantitatively Severe Case Upheld: a of the Narcotics Act. The court reasoned that the threshold for a severe case, previously established by 1999 expert opinions based on the psychoactive substance Midazolam's potential for dependency and lethal mixed intoxications (set at 27 or 36 grams), remained valid despite the age of the reports, as the defendant provided no new scientific evidence to discredit them, and current knowledge confirms the significant dangers and risks associated with benzodiazepines like Midazolam, noting that the defendant significantly exceeded the threshold quantity of 2,400 tablets (36,000 mg).

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Betäubungsmitteldelikte Substanzabhängigkeit mittelschwerer Fall neues Beweismittel Straftaten gegen die Sicherheit des Rechtsverkehrs Sachverständigengutachten

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 19 Ziff. 2 lit. a BetmG
This article is cited as the basis for qualifying the offense as a quantitatively serious case (mengenmässig schwerer Fall) in the final decision.
Art. 1 BetmG
Leitsatz: · Art. 19 Ziff.
Art. 19 Ziff. 1 BetmG
The accused is held guilty of multiple violations of this article, committed as a serious case under Art. 19 Ziff. 2 lit. a BetmG.
KI-generiert
21 02 285
Appellate Court Decision on Provisional Criminal Confinement of Involuntarily Committed Individual
21 09 42
Challenge to Urgent Inpatient Psychiatric Order Based on Insufficient Medical Urgency
V 05 103 2
Expulsion Upheld Due to Severe Criminal Conviction Despite Long Residency
22 08 7
Ne Bis In Idem and Bodily Harm Charges Following Lesser Offense Penal Order

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 19 Ziff. 2 lit. a BetmG

This article is cited as the basis for qualifying the offense as a quantitatively serious case (mengenmässig schwerer Fall) in the final decision.

Art. 19 Ziff. 1 BetmG

The accused is held guilty of multiple violations of this article, committed as a serious case under Art. 19 Ziff. 2 lit. a BetmG.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · II. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · Strafrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 16.12.2008

Fallnummer: · 21 08 123

LGVE: · 2009 I Nr. 52

Leitsatz: · Art. 19 Ziff. 2 lit. a BetmG. Mengenmässig schwerer Fall nach Art. 19 Ziff. 2 lit. a BetmG mit dem Medikament Dormicum.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.