Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
21 07 97 • KG LU 21 07 97 KI-generiert

Simple Assault Conviction Affirmed; Acquittal on Second Assault Upheld Due to Reasonable Doubt

Geschäftsnummer 21 07 97
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Luzern (CH-LU)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Teilweise gutgeheissen (Partially Allowed)
Kostenauflage zulasten Beschwerdeführer/in
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The appellant was accused of simple assault against a referee following a football match where he was sent off for insulting the official and later tripped the referee as he and other officials fled encroaching supporters, causing rib contusions and bruising. The appellate court affirmed the lower court's finding of simple assault against the referee, reasoning that consistent, credible witness testimony, particularly from an experienced referee inspector who observed the deliberate tripping motion and security personnel who saw the appellant aggressively engaging the fallen referee, outweighed the appellant's contradictory and shifting accounts. However, the court upheld the acquittal for the alleged assault on the linesman, concluding that significant doubt remained regarding the appellant's identity as the assailant in that separate incident, given the chaotic circumstances and lack of corroborating evidence from other witnesses. The resulting sentence was a conditional fine increased from the first instance due to the appellant's higher income, plus an unconditional fine.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 123 StGB, Art. 123 Ziff. 1 Abs. 1 StGB, Art. 6 Ziff. 3 lit. d EMRK, Art. 126 Abs. 1 StGB, Art. 123 Ziff. 1 Abs. 2 StGB, Art. 2 Abs. 2 StGB; Simple Assault Conviction Affirmed; Acquittal on Second Assault Upheld Due to Reasonable Doubt: The appellate court affirmed the lower court's finding of simple assault against the referee, reasoning that consistent, credible witness testimony, particularly from an experienced referee inspector who observed the deliberate tripping motion and security personnel who saw the appellant aggressively engaging the fallen referee, outweighed the appellant's contradictory and shifting accounts. However, the court upheld the acquittal for the alleged assault on the linesman, concluding that significant doubt remained regarding the appellant's identity as the assailant in that separate incident, given the chaotic circumstances and lack of corroborating evidence from other witnesses. The resulting sentence was a conditional fine increased from the first instance due to the appellant's higher income, plus an unconditional fine.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
berechtigte Zweifel Einstellung wegen Körperverletzung versuchte einfache Körperverletzung Schuldschein Glaubhaftmachung der Identität echte Konkurrenz

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 123 StGB
Kammer Rechtsgebiet: · Strafrecht Entscheiddatum: · 05.05.2008 Fallnummer: · 21 07 97 LGVE: Leitsatz: · Art. 123 StGB.
Art. 123 Ziff. 1 Abs. 1 StGB
The appellant was found guilty of simple assault (einfache Körperverletzung) against A. based on this article in the final ruling.
Art. 6 Ziff. 3 lit. d EMRK
Art. 126 Abs. 1 StGB
Art. 123 Ziff. 1 Abs. 2 StGB
Kammer Rechtsgebiet: · Strafrecht Entscheiddatum: · 05.05.2008 Fallnummer: · 21 07 97 LGVE: Leitsatz: · Art. 123 StGB.
Art. 2 Abs. 2 StGB
Art. 2 StGB
Art. 123 Ziff. 1 Abs. 1 i.V.m
Kammer Rechtsgebiet: · Strafrecht Entscheiddatum: · 05.05.2008 Fallnummer: · 21 07 97 LGVE: Leitsatz: · Art. 123 StGB.

Zitierte Rechtsprechung

KI-generiert
BGE 118 Ia 462
Foreign National v. Switzerland: Right to Examine Adverse Witness in Drug Case
BGE 116 Ia 289
Supreme Court Overturns Drug Conviction Due to Denial of Right to Question Key Witnesses
BGE 120 Ia 31
Defendant v. State: Review of Drug Conviction and Application of "In Dubio Pro Reo"
BGE 120 Ia 37
BGE 127 IV 103
KI-generiert
21 05 210
Acquittal Costs in Simple Regulatory Offense Case
22 08 7
Ne Bis In Idem and Bodily Harm Charges Following Lesser Offense Penal Order
21 02 101
Victim's Right to Appeal Criminal Acquittal in Bodily Harm Case
21 06 100 3
Appeal Conviction Reversal and Prohibition on Worsening Appellant's Position

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 123 Ziff. 1 Abs. 1 StGB

The appellant was found guilty of simple assault (einfache Körperverletzung) against A. based on this article in the final ruling.

Art. 42 Abs. 1 StGB

Used to determine that the fine should be suspended based on a favorable prognosis.

Art. 42 Abs. 4 StGB

Applied to connect the suspended fine with an unconditional fine (Busse).

Art. 44 Abs. 1 StGB

Used to determine the appropriate duration for the probation period of the suspended sentence.

Art. 47 Abs. 1 StGB

Cited as the legal basis for the court's considerations when determining the severity of the sentence based on guilt, personal circumstances, and the sentence's effect.

Art. 106 Abs. 3 StGB

Cited to justify the amount set for the unconditional fine (Busse) in relation to the appellant's guilt and financial situation.

Art. 34 Abs. 2 StGB

Cited in the reasoning for calculating the daily rate of the fine based on personal and economic circumstances, though not explicitly in the final operative paragraphs 1-7.

Art. 95 ff. BGG

Cited in the procedural notice regarding the grounds for appeal to the Federal Supreme Court.

Art. 99 BGG

Cited in the procedural notice regarding the deadline for filing an appeal to the Federal Supreme Court.

Art. 78 ff. BGG

Cited in the procedural notice regarding the admissibility of an appeal in criminal matters to the Federal Supreme Court.

Art. 42 BGG

Cited in the procedural notice regarding the formal requirements for filing an appeal to the Federal Supreme Court.

Art. 90 ff. BGG

Cited in the procedural notice regarding the admissibility of an appeal in criminal matters to the Federal Supreme Court.

§ 243 StPO

Cited in the reasoning to justify the court's authority to correct procedural errors regarding the non-admission of civil claims for B. ex officio.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht Abteilung: · II. Kammer Rechtsgebiet: · Strafrecht Entscheiddatum: · 05.05.2008 Fallnummer: · 21 07 97 LGVE: Leitsatz: · Art. 123 StGB. Einfache Körperverletzung durch tätlichen Angriff auf Schiedsrichter. Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.