Turning Driver's Duty of Care in Multi-Vehicle Pedestrian Incident
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertAn intoxicated driver proceeding to execute a left turn from the center lane of a main road failed to observe a pedestrian who suddenly ran into the street from the right and was struck first by a parallel vehicle before being thrown into the path of the turning driver, who then ran over the victim. The court reasoned that the turning driver's primary duty of care under traffic regulations required focusing attention primarily to the left, as he was already initiating the turn, and based on the principle of trust, he was not reasonably obligated to anticipate a dangerous situation arising from the right, especially with another vehicle proceeding correctly alongside him; therefore, failing to see the pedestrian before the initial impact did not constitute a breach of the required duty of attention.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertArt. 31 Abs. 1 SVG, Art. 3 Abs. 1 VRV, Art. 26 Abs. 2 SVG, Art. 26 Abs. 1 SVG; Turning Driver's Duty of Care in Multi-Vehicle Pedestrian Incident: Instanz: · Obergericht Abteilung: · II. Kammer Rechtsgebiet: · Strassenverkehrsrecht Entscheiddatum: · 27.11.2007 Fallnummer: · 21 07 80 LGVE: · 2008 I Nr. 50 Leitsatz: · Art. 31 Abs. 1 SVG. Erforderliches Mass an Aufmerksamkeit. Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertZitierte Rechtsprechung
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertVolltext
Rechtsprechung Luzern
Instanz: · Obergericht Abteilung: · II. Kammer Rechtsgebiet: · Strassenverkehrsrecht Entscheiddatum: · 27.11.2007 Fallnummer: · 21 07 80 LGVE: · 2008 I Nr. 50 Leitsatz: · Art. 31 Abs. 1 SVG. Erforderliches Mass an Aufmerksamkeit. Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.