Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
21 07 78 • KG LU 21 07 78 KI-generiert

Jurisdiction for Revocation of Conditional Release Under New Penal Code

Geschäftsnummer 21 07 78
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Luzern (CH-LU)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

An individual conditionally released in December 2004 was subsequently convicted in April 2007 for offenses committed partly during the probation period, leading the correctional services to inquire which authority had jurisdiction to decide on a potential revocation of the conditional release under the newly enacted penal code provisions. The court reasoned that since the new law's provisions regarding the regime of execution of sentences apply even to those convicted under the old law, and drawing an analogy from jurisprudence regarding conditional release (Art. 86 StGB), the court that judged the new offenses (the Appellate Court) retains jurisdiction under the new law (Art. 89 Abs. 1 StGB) to decide on any subsequent revocation of the earlier conditional release.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 89 Abs. 1 StGB, Art. 63 StGB, Art. 38 Ziff. 4 Abs. 1 aStGB, Art. 388 Abs. 3 StGB, Art. 89 StGB, Art. 86 StGB; Jurisdiction for Revocation of Conditional Release Under New Penal Code: The court reasoned that since the new law's provisions regarding the regime of execution of sentences apply even to those convicted under the old law, and drawing an analogy from jurisprudence regarding conditional release (Art. 86 StGB), the court that judged the new offenses (the Appellate Court) retains jurisdiction under the new law (Art. 89 Abs. 1 StGB) to decide on any subsequent revocation of the earlier conditional release.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Widerruf der bedingten Entlassung Strafzumessung Strafprozessordnung Zuführung von Häftlingen bedingte Strafen Freistellung von der Arbeitspflicht

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 89 Abs. 1 StGB
This article determines the competent authority (Obergericht) for deciding on the recommitment to prison following new criminal activity.
Art. 63 StGB
Art. 38 Ziff. 4 Abs. 1 aStGB
Art. 388 Abs. 3 StGB
Art. 89 StGB
Leitsatz: · Art. 89 Abs.
Art. 86 StGB

Zitierte Rechtsprechung

KI-generiert
BGE 133 IV 201
Conditional Early Release and Application of New Drug Sentencing Laws
KI-generiert
V 98 157
Discretionary Revocation of Conditional Release Lacking Prognosis and Consideration of Positive Post-Offense Changes
4N 21 2
Interpretation of Penal Code Article 63b Para 4 Sentence 2 Regarding Conditional Sentence Execution After Outpatient Measures
4H 19 44
Military, Civil Protection, and Penitentiary Service Authority for Conditional Release Decisions
21 06 190
Retroactive Application of Milder Criminal Code Provisions in Sentencing
21 97 176
Deferred Sentence Conditional Suspension Limits

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 89 Abs. 1 StGB

This article determines the competent authority (Obergericht) for deciding on the recommitment to prison following new criminal activity.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · II. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · Strafrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 26.07.2007

Fallnummer: · 21 07 78

LGVE: · 2007 I Nr. 46

Leitsatz: · Art. 89 Abs. 1 StGB. Sachliche Zuständigkeit für die Rückversetzung in den Strafvollzug nach erneuter Straffälligkeit.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.