Appeal Against Bar on Custody Release Applications
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe court addressed an appeal challenging a two-month bar imposed by a magistrate on the submission of personal applications for release from custody, finding that such a bar, despite lacking explicit statutory basis in the relevant criminal procedure code, can be ordered by a judge based on the general prohibition of the abuse of rights (Art. 2 Abs. 2 ZGB) to counter manifestly abusive or dilatory release requests, consistent with constitutional and ECHR guarantees. However, the court reduced the imposed two-month period to one month, reasoning that procedural rights regarding custody review are severely restricted, and although a bar is permissible to prevent abuse, a period exceeding one month is generally disproportionate unless exceptional circumstances, not sufficiently justified by the magistrate, warrant a longer duration, especially when the applicant's behavior suggests a systematic attempt to hinder the proceedings rather than seek a genuine review based on changed facts.
Legislator-Regeste
AmtlichArt. 10 Abs. 2 und 31 Abs. 4 BV; Art. 5 Ziff. 4 EMRK; Art. 2 Abs. 2 ZGB. Unabhängig von einer gesetzlichen Grundlage in der StPO kann der Haftrichter gestützt auf das allgemeine Rechtsmissbrauchsverbot gegen missbräuchliche Haftentlassungsgesuche eine Haftprüfungssperre anordnen. Dauer der Sperrfrist. | Zivilprozessrecht
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertZitierte Rechtsprechung
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertThe court invoked the general prohibition of abuse of rights to justify ordering a bar on examining custody release applications without a specific statutory basis.
This provision guaranteeing personal liberty was cited in the context of the rights being limited by the bar on applications.
This provision guaranteeing the right to challenge detention was cited in the context of the rights being limited by the bar on applications.
This provision guaranteeing the right to have the lawfulness of detention reviewed was cited in the context of the rights being limited by the bar on applications.
Volltext
Rechtsprechung Luzern
Instanz: · Obergericht
Abteilung: · II. Kammer
Rechtsgebiet: · Zivilprozessrecht
Entscheiddatum: · 31.08.2006
Fallnummer: · 21 06 118
LGVE: · 2006 I Nr. 61
Leitsatz: · Art. 10 Abs. 2 und 31 Abs. 4 BV; Art. 5 Ziff. 4 EMRK; Art. 2 Abs. 2 ZGB. Unabhängig von einer gesetzlichen Grundlage in der StPO kann der Haftrichter gestützt auf das allgemeine Rechtsmissbrauchsverbot gegen missbräuchliche Haftentlassungsgesuche eine Haftprüfungssperre anordnen. Dauer der Sperrfrist.
Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.