Concession of Demands in Second Instance and Procedural Costs Allocation

When a defendant concedes the claimant's demands in the second instance, the defendant must bear the procedural costs according to Article 106 of the Code of Civil Procedure, even if the concession was necessitated by the lower court having incorrectly calculated the vacation pay percentage. The court reasoned that the claimant's assertion—that the defendant had consistently paid a higher vacation pay percentage—was a substantive challenge requiring an appeal, not a mere correction under Article 334 of the Code of Civil Procedure, because the lower court's decision was not unclear or contradictory but based on an incorrect factual premise, thereby precluding any deviation from the standard cost allocation rule.