Construction Permit Appeal Not an Abuse of Rights Under Cartel Law
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertIn a claim for damages under cartel law, the court dismissed the action brought by a construction permit recipient against a competitor who had appealed the permit to the administrative court, which ultimately dismissed the appeal for lack of standing. The court reasoned that the competitor's administrative appeal challenging the simplified permit procedure for a concrete processing plant was not a tortious abuse of rights under cartel law because there was no established consensus on the standing of business competitors to challenge planning and building decisions, and the appeal raised legitimate concerns regarding the violation of building regulations that could directly impact competition, especially given that the facility's scope and cost suggested the simplified procedure was questionable.
Legislator-Regeste
AmtlichArt. 12 Abs. 1 lit. b KG; § 207 PBG. Schadenersatzpflicht des Konkurrenten gestützt auf das Kartellgesetz bei einer Beschwerde in Planungs- und Bausachen. | Kartellrecht
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertThis provision was cited in the headnote/decision summary regarding the claim for damages based on the Cartel Act.
This provision was cited in the headnote/decision summary regarding the claim for damages in planning and construction law matters.
Volltext
Rechtsprechung Luzern
Instanz: · Obergericht
Abteilung: · I. Kammer
Rechtsgebiet: · Kartellrecht
Entscheiddatum: · 17.09.2002
Fallnummer: · 12 01 2
LGVE: · 2003 I Nr. 26
Leitsatz: · Art. 12 Abs. 1 lit. b KG; § 207 PBG. Schadenersatzpflicht des Konkurrenten gestützt auf das Kartellgesetz bei einer Beschwerde in Planungs- und Bausachen.
Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.