Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
11 10 55 • KG LU 11 10 55 KI-generiert

Boathouse Addition Ownership Dispute

Geschäftsnummer 11 10 55
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Luzern (CH-LU)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Kostenauflage zulasten Vorinstanz / Staat
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The case concerned the ownership of an addition to a boathouse originally built in 1932 by the defendant's predecessor on the plaintiff's boathouse, following a limited-term agreement that was later terminated. The court affirmed the lower court's decision, reasoning that the plaintiff, as the established owner of the original boathouse, was inherently the owner of the addition under the mandatory provisions of Article 642 of the Civil Code, which dictates that an addition inseparable from the main structure becomes its component part, overriding any contractual stipulations between the parties regarding separate ownership of that component.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 642 ZGB, Art. 642 Abs. 1 ZGB, Art. 642 Abs. 2 ZGB, Art. 19 Abs. 2 OR; Boathouse Addition Ownership Dispute: The court affirmed the lower court's decision, reasoning that the plaintiff, as the established owner of the original boathouse, was inherently the owner of the addition under the mandatory provisions of Article 642 of the Civil Code, which dictates that an addition inseparable from the main structure becomes its component part, overriding any contractual stipulations between the parties regarding separate ownership of that component.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Zivilrechtsstreitigkeit Miteigentum Haftung für Wasserschaden loi d'application immédiate Fahrniseigentum güterrechtliche Hinzurechnung

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 642 ZGB
This provision was the basis for determining that the plaintiff was the owner of the boathouse extension because it qualified as a component part.
Art. 642 Abs. 1 ZGB
9 Leitsatz: · Art. 642 ZGB.
Art. 642 Abs. 2 ZGB
9 Leitsatz: · Art. 642 ZGB.
Art. 19 Abs. 2 OR
KI-generiert
11 06 129
Servitude Deletion and Obsolete Usefulness of Boat House Right
RRE Nr 1462
Lakeside Owners v. Administrative Body (Public Water Use Permit Denial)
1B 14 53
Co-Owners' Access Dispute to Neighboring Roof Terrace Over Water Damage Repair
7H 19 266
Insurance Denial Appeal Affirmed: Boathouse Damage Not Proven Storm Surge Cause

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 642 ZGB

This provision was the basis for determining that the plaintiff was the owner of the boathouse extension because it qualified as a component part.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht Abteilung: · I. Kammer Rechtsgebiet: · Sachenrecht Entscheiddatum: · 28.10.2010 Fallnummer: · 11 10 55 LGVE: · 2011 I Nr. 9 Leitsatz: · Art. 642 ZGB. Eigentumsverhältnisse an einem Bootshaus und dessen Anbau. Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.