Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
11 09 105 • KG LU 11 09 105 KI-generiert

Interpretation of Divorce Agreement Cost-Sharing Clause

Geschäftsnummer 11 09 105
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Luzern (CH-LU)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The court was asked to interpret a clause in a judicially approved divorce agreement where one party agreed to contribute half the moving and cleaning costs, up to a maximum of CHF 5,000. The court reasoned that a judicially approved divorce convention becomes an integral part of the judgment, and its interpretation, when it mandates a non-specified sum, should follow the rules for contract interpretation under Article 18 of the Code of Obligations, focusing on the objective meaning based on good faith, as the subjective intent was not proven. The court concluded that the phrasing "as a gesture of goodwill" and "without admission of legal obligation" did not negate the clear commitment to a half-share, especially given the explicit cost cap, thus affirming the lower court's decision to order payment of the claimed CHF 1,092.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 18 OR, Art. 18 Abs. 1 OR, Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Interpretation of Divorce Agreement Cost-Sharing Clause: The court reasoned that a judicially approved divorce convention becomes an integral part of the judgment, and its interpretation, when it mandates a non-specified sum, should follow the rules for contract interpretation under Article 18 of the Code of Obligations, focusing on the objective meaning based on good faith, as the subjective intent was not proven. The court concluded that the phrasing "as a gesture of goodwill" and "without admission of legal obligation" did not negate the clear commitment to a half-share, especially given the explicit cost cap, thus affirming the lower court's decision to order payment of the claimed CHF 1,092.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Vertragsauslegung Vereinbarung über die Nebenfolgen der Ehescheidung Loyalitätspflicht Zahlungsmittel Kostenbeteiligung des Versicherten Eherecht

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 18 OR
The court analogously applied the interpretation rules of Art. 18 OR to the divorce agreement incorporated into the judgment as the basis for determining the actual obligation.
Art. 18 Abs. 1 OR
9 Leitsatz: · Art. 18 OR.
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This provision would typically govern the allocation of costs, although the specific dispositive orders imposing costs are missing from the provided text excerpt.

Zitierte Rechtsprechung

KI-generiert
BGE 119 II 300
BGE 129 III 630
BGE 132 III 27
KI-generiert
22 06 80
Marital Contract Deemed Disguised Divorce Settlement Requiring Judicial Approval
22 00 27
Divorce Cost Allocation Overturned Based on Reconciliation Protocol Interpretation
22 02 100
Joint Divorce Petition Non-Confirmation Cost Allocation
3B 16 29
Appellate Court Upholds Divorce Based on Intent to Dissolve Legal Marriage Despite Financial Motivation
11 08 130
Suretyship Validity and Contractual Interpretation

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 18 OR

The court analogously applied the interpretation rules of Art. 18 OR to the divorce agreement incorporated into the judgment as the basis for determining the actual obligation.

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision would typically govern the allocation of costs, although the specific dispositive orders imposing costs are missing from the provided text excerpt.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht Abteilung: · I. Kammer Rechtsgebiet: · OR (Obligationenrecht) Entscheiddatum: · 16.09.2009 Fallnummer: · 11 09 105 LGVE: · 2009 I Nr. 9 Leitsatz: · Art. 18 OR. Auslegung einer gerichtlich genehmigten Scheidungsvereinbarung. Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.