Prohibition on Altering Legal Claims on Appeal
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe court determined that the prohibition on altering legal claims in the second instance, as stipulated by the relevant procedural code, is absolute and is not negated by reserving the right to bring a subsequent claim, which would only permit the assertion of different claims in a separate future proceeding. Consequently, the court ruled that it could not consider the appeal where the appellant sought new or increased claims in the grounds of appeal, although a reduction of the legal claims remains permissible at any stage.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiert§ 98 Abs. 2 ZPO, § 98 Abs. 3 ZPO; Prohibition on Altering Legal Claims on Appeal: Consequently, the court ruled that it could not consider the appeal where the appellant sought new or increased claims in the grounds of appeal, although a reduction of the legal claims remains permissible at any stage.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertCited as the rule prohibiting the change of claims in the second instance, leading to the non-admission of the appeal concerning new or increased claims.
Cited to distinguish that a restriction of the claims is always possible, even in the second instance.
Volltext
Rechtsprechung Luzern
Instanz: · Obergericht
Abteilung: · I. Kammer
Rechtsgebiet: · Zivilprozessrecht
Entscheiddatum: · 26.06.2003
Fallnummer: · 11 02 71
LGVE: · 2003 I Nr. 34
Leitsatz: · § 98 Abs. 2 ZPO. Der Vorbehalt eines Nachklagerechts hebt das Klageänderungsverbot vor zweiter Instanz nicht auf.
Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.