Real Estate Listing Scraping Not Unfair Competition Under UWG Article 5 lit. c Due to Defendant's Effort
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe appellate court upheld the lower court's dismissal of a claim alleging unfair competition under Article 5 lit. c of the Unfair Competition Act (UWG), where the defendant systematically and automatically harvested, filtered, processed, and augmented real estate listings from the plaintiffs' online platforms using their own software programs (a search spider). The court reasoned that Article 5 lit. c, which prohibits taking over and exploiting another's market-ready work without appropriate own effort through technical reproduction means, requires assessing the defendant's total effort, including subsequent development and variation, and found that the defendant's process of programming, maintaining, filtering, and enriching the collected data with their own value-added information constituted a sufficient, non-minimal effort, thus precluding a finding of unfairness under that specific provision, and rendering recourse to the general unfair competition clause unnecessary.
Legislator-Regeste
AmtlichArt. 5 lit. c UWG. Wer Daten im Internet elektronisch erfasst und unter Anwendung eigener Programme filtert, bearbeitet und ergänzt, handelt nicht unlauter. | UWG (unlauterer Wettbewerb)
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertThis provision formed the substantive legal basis for determining that the defendant's conduct in collecting and processing data was not unfair competition.
Volltext
Rechtsprechung Luzern
Instanz: · Obergericht
Abteilung: · I. Kammer
Rechtsgebiet: · UWG (unlauterer Wettbewerb)
Entscheiddatum: · 14.07.2004
Fallnummer: · 11 02 168.1
LGVE: · 2005 I Nr. 25
Leitsatz: · Art. 5 lit. c UWG. Wer Daten im Internet elektronisch erfasst und unter Anwendung eigener Programme filtert, bearbeitet und ergänzt, handelt nicht unlauter.
Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.