Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
DCSO/67/2007 • CJ GE DCSO/67/2007 Généré par l'IA

Enforcement Order Validity and Time-Barred Debt Defense

Numéro de cause DCSO/67/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A dispute arose regarding the validity of an enforcement order stemming from a prior judgment concerning a debt collection, where the debtor challenged the order's basis on procedural grounds and alleged the underlying claim was time-barred. The court held that the enforcement order was procedurally valid because the application for enforcement was made within the statutory limitation period applicable to the original judgment, and further determined that the debtor's arguments regarding the underlying debt's enforceability did not constitute a defense against the current enforcement application, thus affirming the enforcement order.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Enforcement Order Validity and Time-Barred Debt Defense: The court held that the enforcement order was procedurally valid because the application for enforcement was made within the statutory limitation period applicable to the original judgment, and further determined that the debtor's arguments regarding the underlying debt's enforceability did not constitute a defense against the current enforcement application, thus affirming the enforcement order.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
validité de la poursuite autorisation d'exécution moyens de défense délais base légale validité de la résiliation de bail Plainte devenue sans objet en cours de procédure | LP.17.4

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This provision is cited in order 2 to regulate the distribution of court costs.
Généré par l'IA
A/270/2013
Property Lien Validity Challenge Regarding Time-Barred Enforcement Action
A/1911/2023
Admissibility of Opposition to Enforcement Based on Time-Barred Debt
A/3563/2012
Debtor's Complaint Challenging Payment Order Inadmissible Due to Time-Barred Enforcement Action
A/2910/2019
Challenge to Debt Enforcement and Certificate of Default Dismissed as Time-Barred and Unsubstantiated
A/4212/2022
Creditor v. Debtor: Validity of Enforcement Order Service and Timeliness of Opposition

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision is cited in order 2 to regulate the distribution of court costs.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

     

     

DCSO/67/07 



                        

 :2+;<:511*%"0;$!52/511*" % "!!"%=(



!&!=>    



?  !"#$%!$&!

         ! " "     #$$ " $%&!   "" $'()*(+,-( . !"!  /$! !%011102%  34&$ #3"!  " "! !'(011(05( 6- &4 ""$$ 78'(011(+( 6-( .! 8!  8$$% &%&#&! 9 "%.8!'(25 6-(   

(       " @ 1* 333352(A & " BBBBBB C   D ( BBBBBB% #$$  " '?" > #$$-  $!     "9 =  %  02 / 511*%    E  F(

(  !"!52/511*%D( BBBBBB%"!!" D ( BBBBBB%"!"$     "9(

 "%D( BBBBBB &&#!0)G0HH+& $D(CBBBBBB!5*0HH5(

"8"7=#$$ I!/  "9= &# #$!# "  $%!8(

C  8 &! " #$$    ""% D( BBBBBB%!0)G0HH+%D(CBBBBBB%!5*0HH5%  3$ D ( BBBBBB(

(  ! 0+ !/511*%&!3"=  !%#$$ &!&#$  "9   02 / 511*   " @ 1* 333352 A% &#  !" $$&#4!& " ! 5;"/511*8!=#$$5H"/ 511*(



 

0( ""79&  !." !  # !  "  # 8  #3! $! &   &"/  """& " #!    "! !8% =  &I  $   "&#/!/ I(H5  #""/!  ! #  /!!$  "! "  " !/   ! # !   " '?/ !% % (0;@01)J 600+0%, 0H<HH2-(

"%"8"!!"(

9   !&"!"!!$!" "  #! "!    4 = " "  " 9 &! " 8 "   '( 0; J ( 01 ( 0  0+ -(

 /(

5( C#(0;(2%#$$"%4&#=# !"%"! =  3   ! &!( C# "    %   $ !3" =#! (

+( #"%#$$$8 $!%" ! 0+ !/ 511*% "    &#  $! 3 "  &! =   !(

  !  #$$%   $     "983% !"4!&  " !!% "/4 "! (% 9! K(



LLLLL



  '            (

)*#%(

!/"$!52/511*" $   "902/511*   "@1*333352(A(

$#+ (

0( &# /4 "! (

5( 9 :2+;<:511* K(

+( !/" (

 ,-*+&> D(!89M%"! JD6 C  D(7""  N %48??( 

   >



 9  !89M ?8$$> ! >  



     "! !&!" =I$$!" 83""8$$