Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
DCSO/589/2007 • CJ GE DCSO/589/2007 Généré par l'IA

Contractual Assignment Validity Without Consent

Numéro de cause DCSO/589/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The court addressed a dispute concerning the purported assignment of certain contractual rights by a business entity to another, where the validity of the assignment was challenged based on the original contract's terms prohibiting assignment without specific consent. The court reasoned that the language in the original contract, restricting assignment unless explicitly agreed to by the counterparty, was clear and unambiguous, and since the purported assignment lacked the required consent, it was ineffective; consequently, the party claiming rights through the assignment did not possess those rights because the assignment did not legally transfer the interest as stipulated by the controlling agreement.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Contractual Assignment Validity Without Consent: The court reasoned that the language in the original contract, restricting assignment unless explicitly agreed to by the counterparty, was clear and unambiguous, and since the purported assignment lacked the required consent, it was ineffective; consequently, the party claiming rights through the assignment did not possess those rights because the assignment did not legally transfer the interest as stipulated by the controlling agreement.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
cession de contrat validité de clause de non-concurrence contrat possessoire conditions commerciales abusives nullité des ententes validité de cession de créance

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Applied to order the appellant to pay the court costs.
Généré par l'IA
A/2590/2005
Validity of Assignment Without Contractual Consent
A/1979/2005
Contractual Assignment Restriction Dispute
A/1746/2005
Contractual Assignment Validity and Notice Dispute
A/4252/2007
Contract Assignment Validity in Retail Installment Sale Dispute
A/3699/2006
Assignment Consent Dispute Regarding Reasonable Withholding

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Applied to order the appellant to pay the court costs.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

     

     

DCSO/589/07 



                        

 >80+?>$#32(#&'#%$#2@"@AAAAAA



'4'BC



     

 !"#$"$"  %&' '  (#) $+ , -. / (#0"((*1    ' 2 2     && 2 &34'   22 &,"+5"061" 7 '2'  %&' '3((83  9)4& :92'  2 2' ',"("($" -1 4) 22&& ;<,"("0" -1" 7' <'  <&&3 434:4' = 237<',"8$ -1"   

" 2'#%$#3@"@AAAAAA3&'&'B2 D *5 99998# /3  ''  E     E :   (F0&" 0+"  ' C E                  ,1                                       !"#"$#"%           &'(      )      )                                   *$!!+E"@"@AAAAAA  %  4:  G 2=    :&&  2    % :  2"

 2 '  ($%$#3  '2B @" @AAAAAA  '  0 '% $# 2 2'     22  '4'"

 8 '%$#32'' '2'2 <&&    ' 4    2=3 2  *5 99998# /3 *59999F#63*599998F*59999FFH"

"    '   2  *5 99998F   *5 9999FF H 4  2'5&'$#"

 /:<   2 D *5 9999F# 63     2=  '' &'0*G$5B@"@AAAAAA4&'22" 2 '' 4 2 3      3 2    50? &"  '7 B +I   (  $5   0* &"  3 23  2 (0*)$5 & &"/:'   2  ''3 @" @AAAAAA  ' B  2  2  55?&"    5 '% $53 2     ?? &" *+ B :&&  23$0&'$#"

 /:<   2 D *5 99998# /3     2=  '' &'  (* ) $# B @" @AAAAAA  22"  2  '' 4 2 3      3 2    50? &"  '7 B +I   (+ 2% $5   0* &"  3 23  2  ( )  0* 2% $5   &  &" / :'  2 ''3@"@AAAAAA'2 50?&"3 F '%$53B2"  4  2#2%$# 2$8%$#'' 4' B @" @AAAAAAA3 4   '  2 2    (F0&"$+ :&& 2(#%$#"

 

(" /&    J   2   ) 3  2 7 2' 2 B :' 4: :&&B 2K2)&'&,"(#"(1"

$" / ' ! %   &3  !22  9 &&  29'   ' 2'9<'B %    , - ((+  (F  " 0%. -  2%' #"$(?>$5  #"$$*>$5 (5$# "0"01"22 )% B  )<   &    4 & !%)  !9' &'C   )<  9   )      ,L %'32 3& 38' "32"801"

2<4 '2 <2%  !2 2,"F+F+."$* " ( "   (? "  13 3   3 2   !  '2'  !  ," F5 1"       2' 9  )<  3  4  2<  =' B <3 ! !22"

0"  :23    ' 3 B    2        2=   '   2 = 3 4  2<   2  E&  2E  :9 7   2 D *5 99998# / 43  3 : 2 G 7 4 2  2    J    ' = ')B & :%) :2'' 2,D*59999F#61"

 3  22' L 3  :22 2 B    '  )& 'B:< 2'  '&'"

 '3  4 '''    2D*59999F#6D*599998#/3323 2 (0*)$5 ()0*2%$5"

8" 2'4 ''%"

+" 2' ' 22 "#$ (0"+3    2'%3 !LBL   4 !&&  2   2 ! '' ' B  '   23 2   !&4!& B "

MMMMM



              



' %  2 >80+?>$# &'  # % $# 2 @"@AAAAAA"











 !"#$C @  NO  H3 2' . @ - /    @"@ HO3)<,1"





   C



@        NO  H &&C        ' C

   2' '4'2 B!&&'2  '922<&&