Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
DCSO/546/2007 • CJ GE DCSO/546/2007 Généré par l'IA

Post-Judgment Payments and Lien Enforcement Validity

Numéro de cause DCSO/546/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The dispute concerned the validity of a lien placed on property by a creditor following a judgment, where the debtor argued the enforcement action was improper because the underlying debt was partially satisfied through payments made after the judgment but before the execution application. The court reasoned that while post-judgment payments reduce the enforceable debt, they do not automatically invalidate the lien or execution proceedings initiated based on the full judgment amount unless the reduction is substantial enough to negate the basis for the enforcement, and the debtor failed to establish that the prior payments rendered the subsequent enforcement action entirely void or that the enforcement was conducted in bad faith regarding the remaining balance.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Post-Judgment Payments and Lien Enforcement Validity: The court reasoned that while post-judgment payments reduce the enforceable debt, they do not automatically invalidate the lien or execution proceedings initiated based on the full judgment amount unless the reduction is substantial enough to negate the basis for the enforcement, and the debtor failed to establish that the prior payments rendered the subsequent enforcement action entirely void or that the enforcement was conducted in bad faith regarding the remaining balance.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
validité de la poursuite action en paiement gage immobilier jugement civil balance des paiements nullité du contrat

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This provision was cited to decide on the costs of the federal court proceedings.
Généré par l'IA
A/1686/2002
Lien Validity Upon Judgment Revival
A/1428/2002
Lien Validity Following Dismissed Foreclosure and Settlement
A/4039/2006
Lien Enforcement Validity Due to Defective Notice
A/1921/2003
Lien Enforcement Affirmation Despite Procedural Irregularities
A/1371/2001
Property Transfer Validity After Debt Enforcement Challenge

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision was cited to decide on the costs of the federal court proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

     

     

DCSO/546/07 



                        

 >0?#$>$#32(#&'$0%$#2  



'4'@A

              !"#$%&%'

 !"#$"$"  %&' '  (#) $+ , -. / (#0"((*1    ' 2 2     && 2 &34'   22 &,"+5"061" 7 '2'  %&' '3((83  9)4& :92'  2 2' ',"("($" -1 4) 22&& ;<,"("0" -1" 7' <'  <&&3 434:4' = 237<',"8$ -1"   

"     : 2 B *5 99995+  <' 2  CCCCCC ,D 2A CCCCCC1E"ECCCCCC3:&& 2,D2A:&&1 &'2''3  $#$53  2=4 ''&22' :22"

  $# 2% $#3 :&&  <'  '4    2  ''"  ) @    2     2= 4&<F   F3%;  22' 2 CCCCCC F    F3  4  '   :22 E"ECCCCCC&$*)$#"

  ' ($%$#3:&&&' CCCCCC4:2 @'432'2''"

" 2'$0%$#3 CCCCCC&'2 '  :&&"  92 4 :92 2  '     2=&'2$#$5'''4$$# 4:&& &:"#*"

 22 5%$#3:&&&&4:922 ''''@ CCCCCC22 ' ?$52' 4 &< 2 '"  23 &&3'''%$($#$($5 &<3    F          !"##F3:2$$#30$5":&&2 2 :22  23 243 ='@ CCCCCC2 ' ?$5"

E"ECCCCCC'''@ '"

" /:'  2B*599995+ 3  2='' &'  2  $#  $5  CCCCCC  4     2  ((  $#3 2  $# 2% $#3  2 '4 ='')'$8$#"



 

("  2' 2  '' '2'  2     & 2 2  !' 2'   '  :&&   2   @  '4    2"   4 23 4  &''432<4'2<2,"(#. "(*"((0."+5"061"

 %"

$"" / !" GG " $ 3    4'     2  2' 2   @ 2   &     2=" / 22''&'3 '2!  2'  )       )< '&&" /!<  !     !"#?3 ' 2'22  44'!2&' !% ';4 & '&&9' )<!22, - ((0($* "036 (?G?(+G.(*5+( "036 (?G$(0#1"   ' !223 2 4! '  2  !2& &3&42' 2' =3 23&&2&, -(*(8* "$36  (?##  #  7 '1"   ;=2;3  2  '  2'2 !"GG "$  2<')4!@!';'  '    !&&2&3 3)4!@4 '    !%  % ! !'  &  )< , -($58#? "$36 $G81"

  %&' ''2''4!2'  ) @'4 ' !'& 2' ' 24!%'  !2'''3'''   '' )' ,-" 81 ! 2 !      '  !"GG"$ "  27; 2 !&&    @  '44922 '2', -#"(G>$0 (G&'$01"

$"%" :23'%34  2=''&'$# $53  & :   2 ' 2  2<3  4: 2'    @  :22 : '' ' D 2  '  22$*)$#D"

 '4 2  7 '2'$G$# 2 "

  '4   2<3 '  (0 2% $#  <' 2 :&&$# 73 & "

 - 4 ' :&&&@"

 2 )'"

0"   2&'3    '  4:    2 2 2:&&3:22:922'    2=34 ''4'@2<22  '  ?  $5    $  $#3   4'  :  2  '' 4  &    2"  2''3442&'4 2 (($# 2' 4 )''4' :  24:H$?$#"



IIIII



  (            )

* $&+)

' %  2 &'  $0 % $# 2  CCCCCC   '  :&&  2  ($ % $#       2 B*599995+ "

% $,")

(" )"

$" '%2< "









-.,'A E  JK  L3 2' . EE"   //   JL3)<"





   A



E        JK  L &&A       ' A 

  2' '4'2 @!&&'2  '922<&&