Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
DCSO/469/2007 • CJ GE DCSO/469/2007 Généré par l'IA

Fee Dispute Over Settlement Agreement Calculation Method

Numéro de cause DCSO/469/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The case concerns a dispute over fees arising from a settlement agreement, where the appellant, having initially received payments under a formula tied to the respondent's revenue, subsequently argued that the basis for calculating those fees should be changed to a fixed monthly sum, which the respondent refused, leading to litigation. The court reasoned that the original settlement explicitly defined the fee structure based on a percentage of gross revenue, and the appellant's continued acceptance of payments under this structure for a significant period indicated a binding agreement on that basis; therefore, the court rejected the appellant's attempt to unilaterally alter the contractual terms to a fixed monthly fee, affirming the original revenue-based calculation as the governing condition.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Fee Dispute Over Settlement Agreement Calculation Method: The court reasoned that the original settlement explicitly defined the fee structure based on a percentage of gross revenue, and the appellant's continued acceptance of payments under this structure for a significant period indicated a binding agreement on that basis; therefore, the court rejected the appellant's attempt to unilaterally alter the contractual terms to a fixed monthly fee, affirming the original revenue-based calculation as the governing condition.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
règlement du litige paiement de l'émolument mode de calcul redressement de prix de transfert rémunération du courtier prix ferme LP.17

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Applied for the allocation of procedural costs for the appeal.
Généré par l'IA
A/17/2007
Fee Calculation Dispute in Related Legal Proceedings
A/4154/2005
Contractual Fee Calculation Dispute
A/1855/2004
Contractual Fee Calculation Dispute
A/1891/2006
Fee Calculation Dispute Under Governing Instrument
A/1841/2002
Settlement Enforcement and Attorney's Fees Dispute

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Applied for the allocation of procedural costs for the appeal.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

     

     

DCSO/469/07 



                        



 >00#8>$#32(#&'(5?$#2  !" #$"



'4'@A

%   !"#$ (#3  ! 2$$+( ($(($

% & '''''' / 3 

% (()*"+, -+)+

 !"#$"$"  %&' '  (#) $+ , -. / (#0"((*1    ' 2 2     && 2 &34'   22 &,"+5"061" 7 '2'  %&' '3((83  9)4& :92'  2 2' ',"("($" -1 4) 22&& ;<,"("0" -1" 7' <'  <&&3 434:4' = 237<',"8$ -1"  

"  $0 ) $#3  4    ,B2 A  1  4 2@: C" DDDDDD32""DDDDDD3CDDDDDD3"

 :&&  2 ,B2 A :&&1  <'  '4  2  E*# 9999F$ -  ! )' 2 '  0( ) $#3 924:2= 3: 2  '%:' 2 4' '4"

  2 ! '' '2'     '   ' )"

" (5&'$#3:&&<'2E*#99998(  <'2 C" DDDDDD3DDDDDD3"

 F  $#3 :&&  92' ' @    :92 '     2=    G         H" !&&  2'' 4   '   3  '%  4' !   '' 2   4 '   4!  2 4  !2%'  2'  @  &"   2'     % ;;   '%"

 2 ! '' '2'     '   ' B &"

"  '@!&&$0$#3 92'4;4 C" DDDDDD  2 7  @    2'3   ' '  4'2@@ 2&3'44 &:%) : ' )0()$#24:&& 2I$0&"F+ &" 92'4:4  92 2' C" DDDDDD34&:%) : B  & 2 4 :&&  2I $(* &" F+  &"  '43     ' :&& @ &     2= @ C" DDDDDD% 2'4 2@% & ?2I3@; $08&"#*"

  (+  $#3 :&&  '2  @    4 2 &   2' 3   J :  2'  '%3 :  2&3 4 & '  2  <   : 2      0 ? $5      GDDDDDD3 C" DDDDDDH   '  ( '% $53 : 4:  % 22& :' 2  '%3:27@ 2'32  &   2"   )' 4:  & 2'9  2 7

224'  :2" /:<  :  '   <  :&&    223 :&&  22' 4  &    2=@ :''''2%  @ B &":&&'@ '4 ' (K)$#:'@4: 2'  '%" 3 2  23 &'  '  )   B  9 2*#9999F$-*#99998( "

 2 ! '' '2'     '  @  '2 2''"

    ' @ :&&  (0 ) $#3     ' 4   LC" DDDDDD2'<2:=7 %< 4:27@:  @:&& 223:&& 2' @&    2=2 ' "    ''4:2 & & 2%"

 K?$#3:&&3&3&' ' )  B4:2 9'4 2  3 22 4  & 2  '  22  &  2  :9& '&:2"

"  ' ' (+?$#3@2(53  '2 @!&&4:9& 2@ L C" DDDDDD     <  :&&    22  ' ' @   DDDDDD  4:  ''3 2  44 3   <      4'  ;& : 2   3  '' 2   4:  ' '  &        9"   2'' 4 :%  '% @  2'342   < 3&& 24:=%'@24:=  2' @&   2=2 2%"    '@:&& 23 2' @&    2=2' 3 &3  ' 2"

  8 2% $#3 :&&     ' @   '2 2') 2"

   ' '2 2@C" DDDDDD3@ DDDDDD32 '22'%"   G           H"

"  < :&& 224C" DDDDDD=  '@DDDDDD@ 2(+?$+"

/:< :2  GDDDDDD3C" DDDDDDH3=<@ CDDDDDD@ 'C" DDDDDD3''  <    0 ?  ( '% $53  @ 4 :2'' '2  :92"

 

("" /&    L   2   ) 3  2 7 2' 2 @ :' 4: :&&@ 2J2)&'&"2 7 '2'  9)  L2< ,"(#"($."(*"( (0."+5"061"

 & !%) ! 2    23 2 '  !&&3   @ '  @  &      !9' &'" &2 '2&!%) !2  2 & ! ' ' , - #"(K>$5  $+  $5  "0"$     '&'. - ($(0+3 6  (KK#  ((0.  3 B3 "(#E(*.- 3/;M3 "(# E$$1"

("%" :23224 2E*#99998( 3:&&  ' B &34:4'@2<F $#"  :22'2B &  ''<" :4$0$#3 2 34:  '@:&& &  2= '%% 2'4 2 ' (K)$#4 : 2& 2''4&!%)30()$#3 : ' )4: 2''4'2 2" :&& '2 (+$#4: 2@47&'  ' ) B &" '2 3 2< : 2 2' 2     '"  3  ;3':&&@2' @&   2= 2   ' "    K? $# B %)   2' 2 B3 :&&'4::% & 2@32   @      %4  2'  @  &    2=2' 3&3&' 2''  ' ) B 2 ''"

 -  4 :&& K?$#:4: 2 &  ' '  )   '4 

2   B  &     2=3  42<:2&'2  '  9) !"(# "$"32'2  7 ''%"

$"       '  ' @ !'  G      H":   :' ' 3  2' '    4' 2 2%,"85"8 22%2 :"(0"+1"

0" '&,"$*"$;"+."5("$"1"

NNNNN

  .

           /





' %  2 >00#8>$# &'  (5 ? $# 2    ! " #$   '  :&&  2  K ? $#     2*#9999F$-*#99998( "





)01A C" '<= O3 2' . CC" ;22  P    C QO3)<"

   A

 C /  '<=O &&A ' A 



       2' '4'2 @!&&'2  '922<&&