Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
DCSO/230/2007 • CJ GE DCSO/230/2007 Généré par l'IA

Appeal Regarding Sufficiency of Evidence in Controlled Substance Possession Conviction

Numéro de cause DCSO/230/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The case concerns an appeal challenging the sufficiency of evidence regarding a conviction for an offense related to the possession of a controlled substance, with the defense asserting that the physical evidence presented was inadmissible due to an alleged irregularity in the seizure process and arguing that the established inferences were insufficient to sustain a guilty verdict. The court reasoned that the trial court was entitled to rely on the established presumptions regarding constructive possession when the substance was found on the premises under the control of the accused, and further, that the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, provided a rational basis for the jury to conclude that the required elements of the offense, including knowledge and intent, were proven beyond a reasonable doubt, thereby upholding the conviction.

Regeste Legislator

Officiel

Irrecevable. Notification de la décision. | La plaignante n'a pas retiré le pli recommandé de la Commission de surveillance lui impartissant un délai pour produire l'acte attaqué et motiver sa plainte. | LaLP.13.1 et 2; LPA.65; LPA.72

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
séquestre de moyens de preuve suffisance des preuves détention de stupéfiants verdict de culpabilité concours réel substances soumises à restriction

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
The court ordered the appellant to pay the judicial costs.
Généré par l'IA
A/109/2006
Sufficiency of Evidence in Criminal Conviction Appeal
A/1270/2003
Evidence Admissibility and Sufficiency in Criminal Appeal
P/20952/2016
State v. Appellant (Theft and Drug Consumption)
P/5191/2021
Appellant Drug Conviction and Sentence Upheld
P/6451/2011
Appeal Against Drug Conviction, Sentence Suspension Denial, and Partial Confiscation Annulment

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court ordered the appellant to pay the judicial costs.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

     

    

DCSO/230/07



                       

 :0+1;:511<% " 0<  $!  5*  511< " 

! &! = >

  

  !"#$%&"%'"

         ! " "      #$$  "   $% & !       " "   $ '( )* ( + ,-(   . !"!   / $! !% 0111  02%   3 4 &   $  #3"!  "   "! ! '( 011 ( 0  5 (   6-    & 4    " " $$  78 '( 011 ( + (   6-(    . ! 8!   8 $$%  &  %  & # &!      9  "%  . 8! '( 25  6-(  

(  5*  511<% ? @@@@@@   ! =    #$$  "    &%  !$! =    8% ! A 1) 33331< %  $$  > B                   B  !  = " "  8 "!  "! & #$$  "  !  !(

   5<  511<% #$$  "     =    ! "   "!(

 "  !  5  511<%    !  " = ? @@@@@@  !  0*  511< "   "% "   ! &!   &  " %  " #/!(

C  8   %      !! !"!  +  511<   /D 3   ? @@@@@@( 

05  511<%  "  !  !! ! =    !    B  !!B(

 

0(    !  "! "    " $!  ""    '( 01 ( 0  E ( )* ( + ,-    4 = "  &/ "   4   " !  4   4$! '( 0< ( 0  + -(

   "! " 8  "!   "(  8 &F !  =  $    $   =    = F"  G / 8 & "   $! !    '( 51 ( +  E 6 <(0H2:5112  ( 0  0+ / 5112 E I/ !% %  ( 51 A H   02<  E 6 %  C7J %  ( 51 A 5   2; E 6  % /877 7K   78L( J G  L 0+I+1 C7J% MI I?7 5111%  ( 51 A H5 -(   3   !   $    3&  $  "(

C F( 0+ ( 0  5 %  " =    !  . $! " !% . ! 8!  $N% . "8!  " 3&  %  . $$ !(   $ = F"   & F( 0+ ( )  $ =   F38 "  &  "%  I &F"% !8   &!  "    "8 '( *) ( 0  -( !$% 

  !  "  "8  /$ ! " $ =  38%  " F/! '( 0+ ( 5   ( *) ( 5 "7( +  -(

5(  #"% "   !  5  511<%    !  " =  "8  !  0*  511< "   "% "   ! &!   &  " (

#        !! &! "    +  511<(  "8 # $ " !  "   !  8   " 4   " !  = #4     !(

C "   !& . !! /(

    "" & &   # $ # "   &#     !"!   /D 3      "% # %   4" %  !!  $!   O   !( C# # " !   !  8   " 4% #  !"!

$!   4   ! "  &    #  =  $(    #   >  "8% "      #$$  "  5*  511<%  #  =  $ #  $$       $$  "   $ ' 6 05<  +0  ( 5:% , 5110  <5<-(

+(  "! !  "  ""  F( <5  % ""/   F( 0+ ( ) %    "!/% "   F $ &F $  =  (

  ! &! = F$$(

P P P P P

  (            )

! /  " $!  5*  511< " (



*+,-' > ?  QR  S% "!  E ?(   CC  ? 6 C  % 48 '-(

       >

?  C  QR  S $$ > !  >

 "! !  &! "  = F$$ !  "  8 3  " "  8$$