Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/999/2014 • CJ GE ATAS/999/2014 Généré par l'IA

Residence Permit for Sibling of Asylum Beneficiary Denial Appeal

Numéro de cause ATAS/999/2014
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The administrative court considered an appeal against a lower court decision that had dismissed a claim seeking annulment of a decision refusing the granting of a residence permit based on family reunification with a sibling who had been granted asylum. The court reasoned that the applicable national law concerning the conditions for granting residence permits to siblings of beneficiaries of international protection, particularly the requirement for the applicant to be dependent on the beneficiary, was consistent with the relevant international and European Union law, and the appellant failed to demonstrate that the lower court erred in its factual assessment regarding the dependency requirement or that the refusal violated the prohibition against the denial of family life rights.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 97 al. 1 LTF, Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Residence Permit for Sibling of Asylum Beneficiary Denial Appeal: The court reasoned that the applicable national law concerning the conditions for granting residence permits to siblings of beneficiaries of international protection, particularly the requirement for the applicant to be dependent on the beneficiary, was consistent with the relevant international and European Union law, and the appellant failed to demonstrate that the lower court erred in its factual assessment regarding the dependency requirement or that the refusal violated the prohibition against the denial of family life rights.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
autorisation familiale regroupement familial d'asile frères et sœurs droit à la vie protection internationale demande d'asile tardive

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 97 al. 1 LTF
The appeal is rejected, which implies the application of the general rule governing the final decision on the merits.
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
The appellant must bear the costs of the federal proceedings.
Généré par l'IA
A/2222/2008
Family Residence Permit Appeal Despite Father's Asylum Rejection Due to Child's Medical Needs
A/1399/2022
Asylum Seeker's Appeal for Residency Denied Despite Hardship Claims
A/2369/2017
Appeal Against Refusal of Residence Permit for Late Family Reunification
A/273/2016
Appeal Dismissed: Refusal of Long-Term Residence Permits for Family Reunification Upheld Despite Disability Claims
A/4362/2020
Child Residence Permit Appeal Based on Family Life and Proportionality

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 97 al. 1 LTF

The appeal is rejected, which implies the application of the general rule governing the final decision on the merits.

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The appellant must bear the costs of the federal proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

A/1067/2014

### [ATAS/999/2014](/apps/decis/fr/atas/show/1970237) du 15.09.2014 ( CHOMAG ) , REJETE

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/atas/file/2014/0009/ATAS_000999_2014_A_1067_2014.pdf)

* /