Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/996/2004 • CJ GE ATAS/996/2004 Généré par l'IA

Statute of Limitations Accrual Date Dispute Reversal

Numéro de cause ATAS/996/2004
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The lower court improperly granted summary judgment against the claimant, finding that the claim was barred by the statute of limitations because it was filed more than three years after the alleged injury, a determination based on a misinterpretation of when the cause of action accrued. The appellate court reasoned that the limitations period only began to run when the claimant knew or reasonably should have known of both the injury and its likely cause, and because the record showed disputed material facts regarding the claimant's actual or constructive knowledge of the cause of the condition, summary judgment was inappropriate, requiring a reversal and remand for further proceedings to determine the accrual date.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Statute of Limitations Accrual Date Dispute Reversal: The appellate court reasoned that the limitations period only began to run when the claimant knew or reasonably should have known of both the injury and its likely cause, and because the record showed disputed material facts regarding the claimant's actual or constructive knowledge of the cause of the condition, summary judgment was inappropriate, requiring a reversal and remand for further proceedings to determine the accrual date.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
délai de prescription créance contestée cause de la demande connaissance effective preuve insuffisante d'aggravation médicale date de dépôt

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Costs were imposed against the appellant.
Généré par l'IA
A/1434/2007
Statute of Limitations Accrual Date Dispute
A/4352/2005
Plaintiff's Diligence and Statute of Limitations Dispute
A/3146/2006
Statute of Limitations and Law of the Case Doctrine
A/3522/2006
Construction Defect Statute of Limitations Application
A/3572/2007
Contract Termination Date and Statute of Limitations

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Costs were imposed against the appellant.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

               $%&%'$&($%$  $))*$%&&(



+  ,+ ! -  +! -! 

%.  /0    '& 1  %&&( 



2- -  + - + 3  /  ' %       !"#$%&



($%

  2    455555555555 ()$*(%+,,) ", % ,))$-!') .%/%%)& %(012  



           ! "#

   63136  

  '   -4 *$'/% 3445   7  8    8    )%)0" ($% 9::::::::::: 8   %()  %()$ ;) "%$<*%"'$+(()$)((+%$=>?

+%%@$)) $  %)/ " 3('/%3445%$),)$;)$"  *%$) ", %   ,))$ ;) )$  . 88   7     9::::::::::: 8  (% ()$  *)(  +)$%$)(    ( +%$=A $    $ ))$)$  7  & *%( )%   ,))$ $ & ),(%'%  %)/ " ')$)(( ($)(?

(%%)% 7  3('/%),(%'$ %)/ ;+ %$)%)$*%'$$)'*'$($)(?

$$ ;+)()$ +*% %$$ %B% %C

 ! - 2   ,+ ! -  +! -! 

7/8   9  :   ;# <*% -=>  % $ %$%)$*%7 8   8    '  -4*$'/%3445

3 B %C   0%,,)%D  %") $D   )%%) //()  

(*)(,(%' *%"$%%@$$($),)"<*%$)));+&+,,)," "% %()*%0%,,

 1343-13445