Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/990/2014 • CJ GE ATAS/990/2014 Généré par l'IA

Employee Dismissal Upheld Despite Procedural Omission

Numéro de cause ATAS/990/2014
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

An employee, dismissed for serious misconduct including persistent lateness and failure to comply with internal regulations, appealed the termination, arguing the employer failed to fulfill its obligation to provide a formal summons for a preparatory meeting following the initial disciplinary notification, which constituted a procedural violation affecting the fairness of the hearing. The court rejected the appeal, affirming that while the procedural steps preceding the hearing are mandatory, the omission of the formal summons for the preparatory meeting, when the employee was otherwise duly informed and participated in the proceedings, did not vitiate the decision to terminate, as the employee was afforded sufficient opportunity to present their defense against the stated grounds for dismissal.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Employee Dismissal Upheld Despite Procedural Omission: The court rejected the appeal, affirming that while the procedural steps preceding the hearing are mandatory, the omission of the formal summons for the preparatory meeting, when the employee was otherwise duly informed and participated in the proceedings, did not vitiate the decision to terminate, as the employee was afforded sufficient opportunity to present their defense against the stated grounds for dismissal.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
révocation disciplinaire manquement de procédure citation à comparaître résiliation immédiate notification de la décision délit d'omission

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
The court ordered the appellant to pay the court costs.
Généré par l'IA
C/23746/2006
Employee Termination Upheld Due to Performance and Conduct
A/4430/2019
Employee Dismissal for Workplace Misconduct Upheld
C/11644/2016
Employee Dismissal Justified Despite Procedural Errors in Lower Court Ruling
A/3756/2022
Employee Dismissal Upheld: Serious Misconduct Justifies Termination
C/4313/2021
Employee Dismissal for Professional Misconduct Upheld

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court ordered the appellant to pay the court costs.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

A/2513/2013

### [ATAS/990/2014](/apps/decis/fr/atas/show/1970228) du 09.09.2014 ( LCA ) , REJETE

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/atas/file/2014/0009/ATAS_000990_2014_A_2513_2013.pdf)

* /