Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/987/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/987/2007 Généré par l'IA

Admissibility of Expert Testimony and Evidentiary Review

Numéro de cause ATAS/987/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The appellant challenged the admissibility of expert testimony regarding the presence of a substance in the respondent's system, arguing that the expert was unqualified and the scientific methods used were unreliable, which resulted in an erroneous verdict in the underlying matter where the appellant was found liable for damages. The court reasoned that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the expert testimony because the expert possessed sufficient knowledge and experience, and the methods employed, while perhaps subject to critique, were generally accepted within the relevant scientific community, thereby affirming the judgment based on the totality of the evidence presented at trial.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF, Art. 64 LTF; Admissibility of Expert Testimony and Evidentiary Review: The court reasoned that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the expert testimony because the expert possessed sufficient knowledge and experience, and the methods employed, while perhaps subject to critique, were generally accepted within the relevant scientific community, thereby affirming the judgment based on the totality of the evidence presented at trial.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
moyens de preuve inattendibles témoin-expert droit à la preuve contrôle de l'appréciation des preuves procédure probatoire structurée contestation de l'établissement des faits

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This article is cited in the final order regarding the allocation of court costs.
Art. 64 LTF
This article is cited in the final order concerning the allocation of legal aid.
Généré par l'IA
A/2633/2004
Evidence Admissibility and Expert Testimony Review
A/1871/2006
Expert Testimony Admissibility Challenge
A/1516/2001
Expert Testimony Admissibility Challenge Affirmed
A/2983/2007
Expert Testimony Admissibility and Evidentiary Challenges
A/4209/2005
Subsequent Remedial Measures and Expert Testimony Admissibility

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This article is cited in the final order regarding the allocation of court costs.

Art. 64 LTF

This article is cited in the final order concerning the allocation of legal aid.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

           $%&'($)((* +$&,*$)((*

 +

 +  +       

-  )

" %, .-  )((* 

 !!!"#$$%  & '

 !' !!!"#$(# 



 )'

*++, + -.' )/0$ "9'

1 )2($3#$## 2

.    ++   4!5 #61 )$$7##$##8-$



                 !"   " #

  $:%  

 / +

#< '=>)#7'$((6#28?@' '!@1'!8'!)  1'  "  !- '    "  #;26 )  !' "#;60'!")#6 ) @'$((0<

$< + ?!99'0=>)1'"!)" '!@1'!8'!) ' "  1')> 1'  !)!"  - !'  1'"- A 1' 9!  4! 1' ? "1 /')'!><

0< =>)!- ')-"9!!)!9#'!$((6)")")'!5 99!  '!@"#3!$((61 '/")! 1')><

%<  '!@" !!)"1')! '!)!))! 1'"- A 1!!)'1"!)!))! "9'1'!)! !4'  ))  - !'   1')! 4! ')  '!>  !) )'  #6 ) @'$((0)#'!$((6<

7< +    ''!'   *++ ,  +   ; =!) $((6  1'))!  4! 1)  '!> 1'  ' )  05##2 9'<  5 )'-!"99)9B CD)' !C41! ) @'$((7<$((0 C$((7!")!)")!)C5!-'!)"8-<+  ''!'. )!   !@' 1>           #6  E) $((6 5- !' C 1')>'   ' )  352(0 9'<77  9 ! "!)  1'))! '!>)!)"'D)=45!- '<

2<   ) ) ")" )'! / 1')!   ' 5!)')! < ' 1!  7 1)@'$((6='!!)! '!!4"45C"9)5 @'-)! 5!!#7 1)@'$((6''D)'!)''))@<

6< 5@5 @=)! "!9!/"")">'"C=>'<

  +

#< 5')<$7 !9""''!@'1>1'"- A1' 9!  -!!'-!-))!-!!)"#6"@'#;;0F.G)'"-!>' #'=-!'$((('8>1' "'!- '< '4 = !) ) 1H ''1'))!  ')!C1')>'F')<#$$)#$0  !-!& G =>!!- ' 1"))5')<60<# !9""'' 1'"- A 1' 9!   $7 =! #;3$ FG  !) C 8-  '!@ ) ' !1!#' E)$((0 !)1'84599!'!

    :#;%(:$((6 0:%  

 ")")'!F')<#%$ G/")'5 99!1')>'@ " '"1')!)! ")'!"1'=>!- '<

$< + 5')<$$.F -)'-!>'1!#'=-!'$(((G  !- '  1'))!    ')! 4! ')  '!>  ) 1')>"  9 '") /')<#$$#$0#%#)#%$ I')<0C7 .511!4) 1' >! ))C)'9"''F<#G< '?4 = !)1'))!   ')!C1')>' ''1 C!99"')'1'))!  ')!>)"  - !'  !@' 1> /!)) "-))   )  !- ' )  1'))!  ')!>)"- !'!@'1>/!))"-))  ) ! '!>F9<')<$%.G< ' = ) C  1'))!    ')! ) C 5- !'  !@' 1> /!))   )    !   '!>  !)"'D)    )  !- ' F . #$3  $0(I .#$;%%%G<

 H18  =>  1'!8' !)  ' "  1')> 1'  !)!"  1'))!    ')! 4! ')  '!> 1'  '<  ) 1')!) )H1')'!>#6 ) @'$((0H)'1')#' !$((6)C4=>)!- ')-/") !'<

0< +    ) 1' !)  1'))!  4! 1)  '!> 1'  ' )  05##2 9'< )! 4  4! 1'  ' )  352(09'< 77  !)"'D) A) "=C ")" " 1'  !)!))!   1'"- A "9'< !!' !)C /&"1  ))#57739'<(7 F05##29'<J$G)&! !)C!&C ))%50(#9'<3(F352(09'<77J$G   ') 4 H)  ' 4!  !)  '   ))  $56%09'<6(<

%< 9 '") C  ='!1' 1!  = ' ")'!) 1 '  1')> =45 ))'9')1'))!  ')! ' = !) !- '"@""9!!!'))1'))! ' !)C!)"'D) 1) !''  ))&!< !)"'D) )")/!!"> 5')<#$ 5 ' '1'"- A1' 9! -!!'-!-))!-!!)"  #3 -'! #;3% F $G     )/ '">)!' ! !&! ) 1"'!' F .#$;$77 !<0G<

7<  " )  ' 1'B  1' "' ")) >')!) F')< 60 < $  ) 3;<# !'1' "'!!)')!-#$1)@'#;37G<



KKK



    :#;%(:$((6 %:%  

   + /  +  +       

#< -!)  . )!   !@' 1>   4 )  - ! C )'9"''   1)        $56%0 9'< 6( C  *++, + 9-' !'!!4 !)"'D) 1) !' !"')8#'!$((6=45  ))'9')<

$< HA ))4@ !<

0< !)41' "')>')!)<

%< 9 '  1')!   4H 1-) 9 '' ' '  )'  1'") ''D)   "!  0( = ' 8   )!9!)!  1'8  '!@ 9""' F+?L!M'? 94!22((%  G1'- !' ')!8'' !) 1@! 9 '")/')<3$ !9""'' '!@9""'#6 =! $((7 F .GI  " !'  ' '  !) !!4'   !   )!9 )  A1'-)1 ')'!>)'' ')  )!'I! !) D)' '"  '!@ 9""' 1' - ! 1 )  1' - ! ")' !4 /  !)!   5')< %$  .<  1'") ''D) )  1!8  1 !   ' ')!- 4"  A1'- !-)D)'= !)C5- !<  >'99!8'  '"!)J         ,N O @+ 

 1! 9 '1'")''D)) )!9!"/1')!!!4HCH99!9""' ' !1'>'99

    :#;%(:$((6