Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/987/2006 • CJ GE ATAS/987/2006 Généré par l'IA

Attorney's Fees Multiplier Dispute

Numéro de cause ATAS/987/2006
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The petitioner contested a decision regarding the calculation of attorney's fees awarded under a statute, specifically arguing that the lower court erred by refusing to apply a statutory multiplier to the lodestar amount for the successful representation in an appeal and subsequent proceedings, despite finding the case complex and the results exceptional. The court affirmed the lower court's ruling, reasoning that while the statute allowed for multipliers based on exceptional results, the lower court was not obligated to apply one, and the record supported the finding that the results, while successful, did not warrant the extraordinary enhancement requested beyond the substantial fee already awarded based on the lodestar calculation.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Attorney's Fees Multiplier Dispute: The court affirmed the lower court's ruling, reasoning that while the statute allowed for multipliers based on exceptional results, the lower court was not obligated to apply one, and the record supported the finding that the results, while successful, did not warrant the extraordinary enhancement requested beyond the substantial fee already awarded based on the lodestar calculation.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
fixation des honoraires d'avocat valeur litigieuse indemnisation de l'erreur judiciaire secret professionnel de l'avocat frais d'exécution calcul du dommage

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Cited for the decision on court costs.
Généré par l'IA
C/26105/2016
Attorney Fee Dispute and Partial Success Appeal
A/3000/2006
Fee Award Challenge Affirmed on Statutory Scope and Lodestar Calculation
C/7181/2014
Attorney Fee Dispute and Mandate Execution Challenge
A/1035/2006
Fee Award Calculation and Justification Affirmed
C/13520/2011
Attorney Fee Dispute Over Insufficient Substantiation

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Cited for the decision on court costs.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



               %&'((%)& %+,-%).

"" 

 "! /!   "/  /! 

/0  .

$ &1 2  ). 



     !" # $ %&' ()"  *+& ,-.)" - $/$#    

+&#

+0#111111111"$+/0002"-34 $25$#

+0#111111111"$+/0002"  

                ! " #$

   '-67'  

 $  3 8 9111111111%  :0'*#3 ;  +02&2< 2&0&  +02&2 +=/ 0#0&>0&#$+//#$34$*0-74#0() $+&?&2&0&; @A*+0&&0+ $B &#*#0 $ ?C0#0" &0&#" *#0>" &&+=> D " &&+=> & &#&0 $ +A" *+E> & 0/*#2>&0+ $ +" & &#4A B= #+#&&@F

B  2&2 55002 D  0 0&#*#+50+ % $  2$2#&0+ $ &#*#0+/$   :0'*#3;   <$3#G40#((,F

 *# $200+ $ H +I& -"       #2/2  #2*#&0+ $B $+//>$5#!,(B) 7"HD0#111111111&111111111"+##*+$&A +&0&0+*#0&0#0/*=2"$+&5#!HB-,7",$+&0&0++&0+5/00F

0&DB++0&0+$#2$-)*&/?#-"   #2$0& *#2&&0+  H +&+?# - D  /+&& $ 5#! -7B)H." ," $+& 5#! -.-"  $ +&0&0+ +&0+ 5/00" &  #80  42 $ ++0&0+ *# $4&  +//00+ &+ $ #+# %'  &  +//00+ &+ $ #+#  /&03#$B+&0+5/00F

 $2/?#-"$25$#+&$2&#/02#$/$$   +#&+&0&0++&0+5/00F

+&2&2&#/0#+I&-H #0?&+$# +0F

&&G#0$0&0+&$*#&0$0(4#0-,F

 *# ##J& $ -( +I& - "  #0? &+ $ # +0 &&& $   67,76-  /&03# $ +&0&0+ %6 6 6   $2#2  $/$#4?"B$/0&*#++2/042$++0&0+5+#/2*# $25$#D+##$5#!-7B)H." ,F

G>/&&$4$2500&05F

   67,,6- *+#& #  +&0&0+ +&0+ 5/00 *+#  /+&&$5#!-.-" F

 $   8    2&2 /+$0502 &  0&0&2" $3  # +I& -H"  #0?&+$#+0"+/*+2$,G>"$+&*#20$&& 40'*#20$&",2&& G>#:#&!&!#&,  <F

0&DK&0+$K2&0+$ G>#"*# #0?52$2# -.G40#-7: H <"#$ +0>4+0$+*&2"H524#0#"



67,,6-  'H67'   $0*+0&0+&#0&+0##>&*#/&&& #0?&+$#+0 $ 02>#  # D &#+0 G> &0&0#" " $ K&&& $ K2&0+ $ +4AG>#F

 +5+#/2/& D B#&! ,   ! - &!  "  #0? &+ $ # +0 +L&  0& 08 $ +&&&0+ *#24 D K#&0 ,  $  +0 52$2# $  +&+?# - #  *#&0 >22# $ $#+0& $ # +0 : <80+&#&04D+0#+&0+5/00: <F

+/*2&*+#G>#$$K*3&002&?0F

KA &#/ $ K#&! -.  "  #4 #  ? $8  /+&& $ +&#0?&0+ &2&/J/80+/0D+&0&0++5+#/2/&D K#&!, %F

 + K#&! H ! H  " K/*+=# 80" 0&&0+/& + *# 2>0> >#4" B+?#4 * $ *##0*&0+ &  00  $+//> D  0 $B+&0+5/00&&$#2*##&K#&!,- %B08*#+>0F

B0 =  0 $ ## 8  42 $ ++0&0+  2&2 $/0  /&03# $K %6 6 6 F

"&+&5+0"42$++0&0+2&2*#++2*#G>/&$-(+I&- D +## $ 5#! -7B)H."(," +0&  /+&& +/*#& $2GD 0 $ +&0&0+ +&0+5/00F

B0 +40&  +28 $ $2##  *#2&   +?G& & $ #=#  $#MF



67,,6-  '767'  



" /  4 ! "! /!   "/  /! 

$

563   7  8   9: &.) !#;

! 2#$/$+?G&F

-! =$#MF

H! 0&8*#+2$#&>#&0&!  >#5503#  *#20$&   =% 2#0 

+*0+5+#/$*#2&##J&&+&0502A*#&0*#>#55





67,,6-