Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/971/2006 • CJ GE ATAS/971/2006 Généré par l'IA

Challenge to Financial Judgment Enforcement and Calculation

Numéro de cause ATAS/971/2006
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Partiellement admis (Partially Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A party sought relief regarding the validity of a previous judicial resolution concerning a financial dispute, arguing that the lower court erred in its interpretation of governing rules regarding payment calculations and enforcement procedures, specifically challenging the calculation of certain financial obligations due under the prior agreement or judgment. The court reasoned that the lower court correctly applied the relevant statutory provisions and established precedent concerning the finality of the prior resolution and the scope of review for post-judgment enforcement actions, finding no material error in the application of the rules governing the calculation of the amounts owed or the process for seeking collection thereof.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Challenge to Financial Judgment Enforcement and Calculation: The court reasoned that the lower court correctly applied the relevant statutory provisions and established precedent concerning the finality of the prior resolution and the scope of review for post-judgment enforcement actions, finding no material error in the application of the rules governing the calculation of the amounts owed or the process for seeking collection thereof.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
interprétation de l'arrêt exécution pouvoir d'examen contrôle juridictionnel dispositions financières action en paiement

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This provision was applied to order the appellant to pay the costs of the federal procedure.
Généré par l'IA
A/1730/2002
Judgment Enforcement Validity Dispute
A/1377/2006
Financial Obligation Calculation Dispute Appeal
A/2574/2006
Challenge to Calculation of Amounts Owed Affirmed
A/1621/2003
Post-Judgment Interest Calculation Dispute
C/30328/2002
Judicial Review of Financial Obligation Calculation

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision was applied to order the appellant to pay the costs of the federal procedure.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



                 



! "#! $%  !$ %$"

$&'(   )   *'(           !"#$%    &     &    '(    !()*"+!"),-% &#$       

    

   1-.21  

)  + ,)3"$"2,#-00/!)"      4   (    5 (6  $#$ %     #7#&"##"8429/:;3$&&"3&&)$%&&" "$#7-009%&7-00<=

4&$$"$3$"#""#<)-00/=

3"$",/#-00/!:#$33&8*&!$"&" "4"#&&"4'3>$$!"$&+4&$$)&)$ 7>&">!*&$"#"=

4&$$&*&$,2*&-00/&"&"$=

3&&$&$&"8)#7-00/=

"4"!4&$$")##&>=

 3&&)"+4:?&#"&$"3#&!#3& &"&&:@"4&$$=

4)&"4&$&"+#&:&>;

 $ -%".  "#! $%  !$ %$"

)

) /00    1 2 

30 + '' 4 1/ 5 6  %78

,; &&"+4A&")3B (##" 8429/:;

-; CB"#&&+"7;

2;  & ? 3& "  +4 :?&  #"&$ " 3#&! #3& &"&&:@"4&$$;

9; 33&"C&;<0 !:#3&"+C3)&:#  &3$&D&""$"20*"@&:&33 ##"$"$ 7:$"$"!(EFGE:+/!/009   !&?#3;"$3&D&3>$;#$#"&H 6"+?&#&+"$&"$7&&3"



.-/,0.-00/  12.21   "$&&+$=76?33+#&:&#3)"#"&& &"$=63&>&"3$&&;(#$# &&3&$$#&$#$$&&676&61"! 7 :$"$ "   3 3 &  #&@    +C ") "$ )7;  #$# "  #&   #B " 3)!+&*&!+"$&&+$&C)33"+ $&$?3$"$&5&;,2-!,0/&,0I6;    >::@H $"&H     1  J K      3:#"3$&D&&&:$?3&3>::





.-/,0.-00/