Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/967/2004 • CJ GE ATAS/967/2004 Généré par l'IA

Contingency in Written Agreements Superseding Prior Instruments

Numéro de cause ATAS/967/2004
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The case concerned the interpretation of a statutory provision regarding the validity of an agreement based on a prior written instrument, where the agreement included language suggesting it was contingent on a subsequent, unfulfilled condition. The court reasoned that the language in the subsequent agreement, which explicitly mentioned the prior instrument and stipulated that the agreement was subject to the completion of an event, demonstrated a clear intent by the parties to make the later agreement contingent upon the occurrence of that event, thereby superseding or rendering the prior instrument unenforceable until the condition was met.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Contingency in Written Agreements Superseding Prior Instruments: The court reasoned that the language in the subsequent agreement, which explicitly mentioned the prior instrument and stipulated that the agreement was subject to the completion of an event, demonstrated a clear intent by the parties to make the later agreement contingent upon the occurrence of that event, thereby superseding or rendering the prior instrument unenforceable until the condition was met.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
interprétation complétive du contrat réalisation des conditions matérielles accords particuliers contrat complexe acte préparatoire en droit des obligations concordat ordinaire
Généré par l'IA
A/11/2006
Contract Validity and Superseding Agreements Dispute
A/2065/2003
Superseding Contract Enforceability Dispute
A/2097/2006
Contractual Supersedure Dispute
A/98/2005
Contractual Interpretation and Liability Limitations Dispute
A/2700/2005
Contractual Interpretation and Successive Agreements Governing Separate Obligations

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

                !"#$ !""%  &'( !""%



) *)+ +,+  )+ ,*

 !- ./ 0 !""% #1  23 0 



   44444444444 



 

5,+*,+ ,6  6+7,* , 6+* +, 8)+ )  7* ! "#$% &'(&)&& #!&*



5,+*,+ 6  6+7,* , 6+* 8)+ )  7* ! "#$% &'(&)&& #!&*



                     $)-/$  

,% 23%&  4)..1(5677777777777%% %4 8!% 9: %3  3+!; 3,% 3+ %  3 %       6  66  63% 3% :<)/='>)(.?!% +@ 9 ?A#&B% )..1(%  :<)11=?0?('.!% +@ 9?A# &B% )..1 9%%++ : %(:<&1=&/>(0.! % +@ 9?A#&B% )..1C

3%&!4)..1(%,+ %4+ 28% %+!% 3 +%!3  %%% %  8"% 3% :<)11=?0?('. %:<)/='>)(.?C

3%&'!4)..1(%%2+ %4  + 28 %  %% % 8+ %   !   %4  8D1!498%2! %!% + +%"+   3 %(    6  66  6 8""  9 3;       % +@  9: %33+!;3,%4%" % 3%   6 C

8+2+ %4E3   %FC

8%!% #3 C



 -)./0-)..1   $/-/$  

  ,*5  *)+ +,+  )+ ,*



92.:.   ;  <.. .  8= >'! ,?

&<   % C

)< ;G<         ",,%#H  +% H   %:: I%6 I       



3%,3+ @   %,%+J3 %%%2898,,%,++ %3",,

 -)./0-)..1