Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/950/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/950/2007 Généré par l'IA

Agency Relationship Dispute over Financial Transactions

Numéro de cause ATAS/950/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A matter involved a dispute over whether the contractual relationship between the parties was one of agent and principal or something else, specifically concerning whether one party was authorized to act for the other in certain financial transactions. The court determined that the relationship established by the documentation and actions of the parties constituted an agency agreement, finding that the evidence demonstrated the requisite authority and control indicative of an agency, thereby affirming the lower court's finding regarding the scope and nature of the relationship that bound the parties.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Agency Relationship Dispute over Financial Transactions: The court determined that the relationship established by the documentation and actions of the parties constituted an agency agreement, finding that the evidence demonstrated the requisite authority and control indicative of an agency, thereby affirming the lower court's finding regarding the scope and nature of the relationship that bound the parties.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
objet du litige transaction financière mandataire relation d'affaires notion d'entité adjudicatrice procuration

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Applied to rule on the costs of the federal court proceedings.
Généré par l'IA
A/4393/2006
Agency Relationship Determination in Professional Services Contract
A/36/2005
Contractual Dispute Over Property Financial Transactions
A/2500/2004
Contractual Breach and Financial Obligations Dispute
A/6/2007
Contractual Rights Enforcement in Financial Dispute
A/1415/2003
Contractual Interpretation and Breach of Business Agreement Dispute

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Applied to rule on the costs of the federal court proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

           ()*+)(),,* #(-.,(),,*

#

 #$ #     $

"/0  + ' 1 2/0  ),,*         !"#  $   * %   %  !&' ( %  )    *    %%  %%       !" *!" +&&  '',-. (%( %  

       !  "  #$#% ! &' ' 

   (.#0(  

 '  3 4'*"12  %% 3(12 45" "$(!  '6!'7783  49

$ .,,0 * .,,8 $" $* ! :  **!* * 55*" 1   !" ( **12 ;"*<!*=1*;:+=9

 $" $"** 1*   >   $?* 1     " $@* !<!* 5 **!*9

   ?* A1>" >$ ?* @@"  1"  12  < <*  *  += *  !" ( ** * >$  * $  1" 5  "*!* >!**!*"**B*5"9

 1 "  11*  .C B .,,/    5!"  1  1*9

 1   0' B* .,,/ $"  **"  * " 12   9

(*! < "!!<B* !1"*9

$"*"@*"!"  #./'.#.,,/9

$?*": "*!:$?<*" !*5> $***A1"* 5** !*5?>"9

 1   .' D* .,,/    5!"  <  " >  < <*  *  += ?*    " *   ?* !!>"'8D*.,,/9>*<B@">$$"**1!1"**1 *=*@*>$11**:   "5! 1** *A1** $"9

 2">$*5* ":$"*E*12 ?1" ":?**1 "*!$"*  1** 9

.7D*.,,/$"1"">@51**9

     4'$?* 1  * 11*   *5 : $"  " 1**   !<!*  5  **!* *9

$ ?* 2  $ !   *  ?F   :   1 ? "9



#./'.#.,,/  (0#0(  

  5#$6  #$ #     $

'

'& !** "11* .CB.,,/&

.& ?:1 "&

0& 5!  1*   >G 1?* 5!  *  1"* H*   "  0, B 2  *5* 12  < 5" " 3%=IJ=5>CC,,8  41? !*2  * 1<5!"!*A*&6. 5" " <5" " '/ B .,,- 3 K49  !"!   *  >   !*5 * !F 1?*1*@* * ! *9 * H*  "  < 5" " 1 ? 1*  1 ? "*> A  *  $*& 8.  K&  1"* H* *  12  1  *?>"!!!F 1? ?*H*B*:$?&  @552  " *     ( + L 

15! 1"*H***5"A1*>G:G555" " *"1<>1@55



#./'.#.,,/