Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/946/2004 • CJ GE ATAS/946/2004 Généré par l'IA

Res Judicata Effect of Prior State Judgment on Federal Defense Assertion

Numéro de cause ATAS/946/2004
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The court considered whether a party's failure to raise a defense in prior state proceedings precluded them from asserting that defense in federal court, given that the prior proceedings resulted in a final judgment on the merits. The court reasoned that the applicable rule generally bars federal courts from re-examining issues that have already been actually litigated and decided in a valid and final judgment in a prior action, meaning the prior state court's ruling on the merits of the claim, including any defenses that were or could have been raised, has preclusive effect in the federal action, thereby precluding the current assertion of the defense.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Res Judicata Effect of Prior State Judgment on Federal Defense Assertion: The court reasoned that the applicable rule generally bars federal courts from re-examining issues that have already been actually litigated and decided in a valid and final judgment in a prior action, meaning the prior state court's ruling on the merits of the claim, including any defenses that were or could have been raised, has preclusive effect in the federal action, thereby precluding the current assertion of the defense.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
chose jugée effets de l'arrêt moyens de défense violation du devoir de motiver arrêts en appréciation de validité réexamen d'une décision antérieure

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
The provision is cited in the dispositive regarding the allocation of costs.
Généré par l'IA
A/1886/2007
Preclusive Effect of Prior Judgments
A/4391/2005
Application of Res Judicata to Prior Judgments
A/1417/2003
Res Judicata Barring Subsequent Property Dispute Litigation
A/28/2006
Prior Judgment Bars Subsequent Property Dispute
A/1785/2006
Interpretation of Prior Judgments and Damages Calculation

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The provision is cited in the dispositive regarding the allocation of costs.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

               $%&%'$%(() $*)+$%(()

!!

, !-,   ,!  

# &' . / %(()

01  23 / 



# 44444444444 





55   6     !"#  ""!  $%&'#()((*+$



                ! "#

   /),%/  

,  5

0"111111111112  3"454"6!4574+87"+" 4"33 "*44"+!844+9

5"  +"  4" (::( 4  4!" !! "# "# 7   !2"9

5" "";" 4<6!*4533"45!"= > 4")'?")&&$9

$&!)&&.#"4!4 @+"2  3""4543!"9

4 ""4(:+")&&.#A 4" "!!4 ?!B!#533"  7"4!=>? 4!4!"3;55# 4!4 5+"@B"<75/<6!79

  ( ?" )&&.# 5"      4"7   4 4!4    !B!2?#;5"!"@54!"9

   4 . ?" )&&.# 5    ;5  ! + 5 "  7    @  !"* 4!4  !"  4 "" 4 (:+")&&. ="*$ >9

 5   3!  ""  " 4 ): ?" )&&. @  4 "" 4 (:+")&&.9

5"    " ;" 5+" !B<  4   4 "  7# "  4""444!444 4(?")&&.9

4 """"4%2)&&.# !"4C #  ;5" 5A""  !"3 4 "" 4 4 "#  4   5"" "+29

  " 4 (( 2 )&&. 4     !"# 5   "4"; DE"@+;""4";;! !""+2#@ "  <";#?+3"4!""4 ""F9

"  !"(%2)&&. "24 !!2?4 ! 9

5" "4 4"+ 4""#5   4# " 4 ( +!2 )&&.# ;5+ 454  !"4 4 !<# " +" @4452"4G/++"E"7 "2""   7F# E  4  ""  !; 45"3!"F  E 4F9

 ,)()-,)&&.   /$,%/   5;5*+"   ";5"+"3"!3!  ""9

5"+"  @  # 5"  ""! # 4   +" 4 ): 2 )&&.#    ? 4 #   " ;   4   5 @ 5   44.?")&&."@+4!4""4 ""3! "2 45"" !"  3"" ; 3"!  4 "" """ 4 (: +" )&&.9

!  !

"4(.+!2)&&)!4"3""7+"57""?4""" =># +"7(H)&&$#""  "24 "   " ";# !!   " "+ @  "

3 4 5/<6!74)%?"(:-)= >9

   " .: I ( 4  " 7+"  !"* 4 <6!7 = ) )&>  %$I ( I 2 4 *7! 45A " 4  " 7+"  !"* 4 <6!7 =))&I&(>#4 """+"45#745A "4"   3 4 # + B ; # 4   ? "+  "3""#+"45""*44""7  59

5 4 " !   ? !! @ "  4!" 4  !!"" =I$- I ( 4  " 3 4    " 7   4 4" 4  " J K>9

 "4"+B!"44"?44 "@5##@ 4#@"@ "4"!";"" =I$:I( >9

5 5*#  4 "  7 4  ?  3! ""  "+  @ < !4")L!")&&.=(:+")&&.M'?44 "4744+" !!4 N)L+")&&.M$&?>9

 3  4*  4  /  ;" 5  4!    / ; 5""5"+44 " 79

5+45I.&I( #4 " 7B7 9

533# " 44"A"7;""B!"  "4!D!""!"A"2"" 4"# 4  !"* ;  " < + "4 ; 5 ;"  52? 4   44 3"""+! 3="0#"4!"""3#+I)# (::(#I(-(>9

 ,)()-,)&&.   /.,%/   5""44 "4B4 #4!"*A"#@ 4"";; !4""  !B< #3#457"4 4 "3"A =I.(I( >;54!44""!"+ # "4";   4 5!B<!# "    4  4"A ? @ ! 4 "O" 9

5" 57" @ 4 4""" "! "+ A; "   B 4 7  ="4 4 "  4!"""+ 4  3 4 " J K L&,(::L# "4I%I.#I$L'9 P((:-'"4I)9 P(())%L"4I)>9

55*#3";5 "+"7+4"+ 43!"""B"4  !!!"3+24""4

4 "9

533#"4""4 ?@4?"7#4 "; 7" ?7 33"9

5 # " "  3! ""  +74  4"# ;"  @  "@! "#3"4"7!29

4 """"4"""B3"! ? 9

 ,)()-,)&&.   /%,%/  

  Q0 PQ#        Q QQ  QQ   QD

#

728   9  :   6; &+% <=

  8 

(I  +29

# 8

)I ?9

$I 3!  " 4  ;5 + 3!      B 4  4 " 4 $& ? 4*  "3""  " !!4  4   "2 3 4  4 # Q<R"G<3;" L# L&&.   #  " A!"I  4 "   B 7 I  ! !" 4"D > "4"; A!;4 ""4 "2""44 "" ; 9 2> A  ; !"3 " "! +" 4!4  

4 ""9 >   "7   4   I Q"  ! !"  "   "  ! !     > 2>  > "/4#  "23 4 4!"*;5" 4+4 "+2I! !"4!"!8 4 +# ;"  ?"# "" ;  4 "" ;   5+ 4 ;  A 4" =I($)#(&L(&->I  733"*D   "4D   "PP S"Q S       



 " 3! 4   B  "3"  A " "" ;5  "

45 @5 !"733

 ,)()-,)&&.